The simultaneous binding of a molecular entity through two interactions is a frequently pursued recognition mode due to the advantages it offers in securing molecular self-assembly. Here, we report how the planarity of the benzothienoiodolium (BTI) cation allows for preorganizing in the cation plane the hydrogen, halogen, and chalcogen bonds (HBs, XBs, and ChBs, respectively) formed by the phenyl hydrogen, iodolium iodine, and thienyl sulfur. Crystallographic analyses of some BTI salts show how this interaction coplanarity enables their coupling to point toward a single anion that is coordinated via the supramolecular and heteroditopic synthon XB/HB or XB/ChB, the latter observed here for the first time. These synthons adopt a Janus-like arrangement around iodine. Crystallographic information suggests that interactions of the synthons act synergistically, e.g., when resulting in the unusually short ChBs formed by the thienyl sulfur. Determination of the molecular electrostatic potential, Bader’s quantum theory of “atoms-in-molecules” analysis, and natural bond orbital investigations give information on the nature and energetic aspects of the short contacts observed in crystals.

Different algorithms for processing the quantitative gas chromato­gra­­phic ana­lysis data using the double standard addition method are compared for their accuracy. Three principal approaches are possible for such processing: I – simple comparison of values determined by sing­le and double standard additions, II – approximation of «peak area of ana­lyte» (S) – «mass of standard addition» (madd) depen­den­ce by the least squa­res method [linear reg­res­sion, m(S)], and III – independent quantification of analyte with both standard additi­ons follo­wed by the linear extrapolation of two sub-results on the so-cal­led «zero standard addi­tion», mx(madd ® 0). It is concluded that the quantitation results obtained using the various modes of the method are comparable in accuracy, but somewhat underestimated relative to the specified amounts of analytes. The principal reason of such systematic errors is the eva­po­ration of the solvent during the successive injecting of the same samples into the gas chroma­to­graph. Due to this reason the peak are­as, measured after the standard addition, appear to be slight­­ly increased and this leads to the systematic underestimation of the results. The second (less impor­tant) factor is the small increa­se of the samp­le volumes due to the addition of the compo­nents to be determined. It is confirmed that the systematic errors of different modes of standard addition are not exceeding the values of their random uncertainties. The op­ti­mal results (considering their signs of deviations) are provided using the double standard addition method with extrapolation of sub-results on «zero standard addition». In order to exclude the possible influence of «human factor» (increasing the re­sults precision during the series of analyses of similar samples due to the rising experience of analytical chemists) all parallel measurements have been per­for­med by bachelor students of the Chemistry Ins­titute of the St. Petersburg State University in the course of their laboratory practical works in chromatography. Such organization of experiments increases their credibility as it excluded the dependence of the results on the qualification of chemists.