Before biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (b/tsDMARD) treatment, latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) screening by tuberculin skin test (TST) or interferon gamma release assay (IGRA) is recommended. However, both tests have reduced reliability in immunosuppressed patients. We investigated whether dual LTBI screening with both tests could reduce the incidence of tuberculosis. Methods: Consecutive patients receiving b/tsDMARDs for rheumatic diseases in a regional hospital were recruited. All patients underwent either TST/IGRA or both. They were categorised into a single or dual testing group and were followed up for at least 6 months. Isoniazid was prescribed if any one test was positive. Results: In total, 217 patients were included in this study; 121 underwent single LTBI testing and 96 underwent dual testing. Tuberculosis occurred in nine patients in the single testing group and one patient in the dual testing group (7.4% vs 1.0%, P=0.045). However, the difference was not statistically significant when follow-up duration was considered (log rank test). In total, 71 patients tested positive for LTBI with isoniazid treatment (28.9% in the single testing group and 45.8% in the dual testing Comparison of single and dual latent tuberculosis screening strategies before biologic and targeted therapy in patients with rheumatic diseases: a retrospective cohort study
Background: Patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) are at risk of reduced bone mineral density (BMD). Objectives: To compare the prevalence of reduced BMD between patients with IIMs and controls and to determine its risk factors. Design: This was a single-center case-control study. Methods: BMD was assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The prevalence of reduced BMD in IIM patients and age-and sex-matched non-rheumatological controls was compared. The BMD results of female IIM were also compared to age-matched female rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. Independent factors associated with reduced BMD in IIM patients were identified by multivariate analyses. Results: A total of 230 patients (IIM: 65, non-rheumatological controls: 65, RA: 50, SLE: 50) were recruited. The mean age of IIM patients was 58.6 ± 11.0 years and 76.9% were females. Significantly, more IIM patients had reduced BMD (73.8% versus 43.1%, p = 0.043) and osteoporosis (29.2% versus 13.8%, p = 0.033) than non-rheumatological controls. Multivariate analysis confirmed that IIM was independently associated with reduced BMD (OR: 2.12, p = 0.048, 95% CI: 1.01–4.46). The prevalence of reduced BMD was not significantly different between IIM, RA, and SLE patients but the mean hip BMD was the lowest in the IIM group (0.641 ± 0.152 g/cm2 versus 0.663 ± 0.102g/cm2 in the RA group versus 0.708 ± 0.132 g/cm2 in the SLE group, p = 0.035). Lower body mass index and more advanced age were independently associated with lower BMD in IIM patients. Conclusion: Reduced BMD was more prevalent in IIM patients than in non-rheumatological controls. Hip BMD was lower in patients with IIMs than RA or SLE. Close monitoring and early treatment are encouraged especially in patients with risk factors.
Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a systemic connective tissue disorder characterized by progressive skin and visceral organ fibrosis, vasculopathy, and immune dysregulation. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a common manifestation and major contributor to morbidity and mortality. Immunosuppression is usually indicated for extensive or progressive SSc-ILD. Recently, antifibrotic and biological therapies have been shown to be efficacious in treating SSc-ILD in various studies. In this article, we will descriptively review the latest evidence on the treatment of SSc-ILD.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.