Purpose The aim of the study was to evaluate spectral mammography (CESM) in diagnosing breast cancer, which is based on sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Material and methods The study included a group of 547 women who underwent spectral mammography and histopathological verification of the lesion, previously seen in mammography and/or ultrasound. In the group of 547 women, 593 focal lesions were diagnosed. All CESM examinations were carried-out with a digital mammography device dedicated to performing dual-energy CESM acquisitions. An intravenous injection of 1.5 ml/kg of body mass of non-ionic contrast agent was performed. Results The analysis includes 593 breast lesions, in this group cancer was detected in 327 (55.14%) lesions, and in 256 (43.17%) cases benign lesions were confirmed by histopathological examination and at least 12 months of observation. The method shows differentiation of benign and malignant lesions in the breast: sensitivity of 97.86%, specificity of 59.4%, PPV – 74.76%, NPV – 95.76%. Conclusions Spectral mammography could be an ideal method to detect breast cancer. Thanks to the high NPV (95.76%), it facilitates the exclusion of cancer in situations where pathological contrast enhancement is not observed. The unsatisfactory specificity of the study (59.4%) would not make it safe to avoid a core needle biopsy of lesions that undergo contrast enhancement.

Background: Evaluating the tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is key to planning further therapy of breast cancer. Our study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of low-energy and subtraction contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) images in the detection of complete response (CR) for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer. Methods: A total of 63 female patients were qualified for our retrospective analysis. Low-energy and subtraction CESM images just before the beginning of NAC and as a follow-up examination 2 weeks before the end of chemotherapy were compared with one another and assessed for compliance with the postoperative histopathological examination (HP). The response to preoperative chemotherapy was evaluated based on the RECIST 1.1 criteria (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors). Results: Low-energy images tend to overestimate residual lesions (6.28 mm) and subtraction images tend to underestimate them (2.75 mm). The sensitivity of low-energy images in forecasting CR amounted to 33.33%, while the specificity was 92.86%. In the case of subtraction CESM, the sensitivity amounted to 85.71% and the specificity to 71.42%. Conclusions: CESM is characterized by high sensitivity in the assessment of CR after NAC. The use of only morphological assessment is insufficient. CESM correlates well with the size of residual lesions on histopathological examination but tends to underestimate the dimensions.

Background and Objectives: Regardless of the improvement in key recommendations in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), the prevalence of total occlusion (TO) of infarct-related artery (IRA), and the impact of TO of IRA on outcomes in patients with NSTEMI, remain unclear. Aim: The study aimed to assess the incidence and predictors of TO of IRA in patients with NSTEMI, and its clinical significance. Material and Methods: The study was a single-center retrospective cohort analysis of 399 consecutive patients with NSTEMI (293 male, mean age: 71 ± 10.1 years) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. The study population was categorized into patients with TO and non-TO of IRA on coronary angiography. In-hospital and one-year mortality were analyzed. Results: TO of IRA in the NSTEMI population occurred in 138 (34.6%) patients. Multivariate analysis identified the following independent predictors of TO of IRA: left ventricular ejection fraction (odds ratio (OR) 0.949, p < 0.001); family history of coronary artery disease (CAD) (OR 2.652, p < 0.001); and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) level (OR 0.972, p = 0.002). In-hospital and one-year mortality were significantly higher in the TO group than the non-TO group (2.8% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.007 and 18.1% vs. 6.5%, p < 0.001, respectively). The independent predictors of in-hospital mortality were: left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at admission (OR 0.768, p = 0.004); and TO of IRA (OR 1.863, p = 0.005). Conclusions: In the population of patients with NSTEMI, TO of IRA represents a considerably frequent phenomenon, and corresponds with impaired outcomes. Therefore, the utmost caution should be paid to prevent delay of coronary angiography in NSTEMI patients with impaired left ventricular systolic function, metabolic disturbances, and a family history of CAD, who are at increased risk of TO of IRA.

Background: Sacubitril/valsartan, an angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), has demonstrated a survival benefit and reduces heart failure hospitalization in patients with heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF); however, our experience in this field is limited. This study aimed to summarize a real clinical practice of the use of ARNI in HFrEF patients hospitalized due to HFrEF in the era before the 2021 ESC HF recommendations, as well as assess their clinical outcome with regard to ARNI administration. Methods and Materials: Overall, 613 patients with HFrEF hospitalized in 2018–2020 were enrolled into a retrospective one-centre cross-sectional analysis. The study population was categorized into patients receiving (82/13.4%) and not-receiving (531/82.6%) ARNI. Clinical outcomes defined as rehospitalization, number of rehospitalizations, time to the first rehospitalization and death from any cause were analysed in the 1–2 year follow-up in the ARNI and non-ARNI groups, matched as to age and LVEF. Results: Clinical characteristics revealed the following differences between ARNI and non-ARNI groups: A higher percentage of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED) (p = 0.014) and defibrillators with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT-D) (p = 0.038), higher frequency of atrial fibrillation (p = 0.002) and history of stroke (p = 0.024) were in the ARNI group. The percentage of patients with HFrEF NYHA III/IV presented an increasing trend to be higher in the ARNI (64.1%) as compared to the non-ARNI group (51.5%, p = 0.154). Incidence of rehospitalization, number of rehospitalizations and time to the first rehospitalization were comparable between the groups. There were no differences between the numbers of deaths of any cause in the ARNI (28%) and non-ARNI (28%) groups. The independent negative predictor of death in the whole population of ARNI and non-ARNI groups was the coexistence of coronary artery disease (CAD) (beta= −0.924, HR 0.806, p = 0.011). Conclusions: Our current positive experience in ARNI therapy is limited to extremely severe patients with HFrEF. Regardless of the more advanced HF and HF comorbidities, the patients treated with ARNI presented similar mortality and rehospitalizations as the patients treated by standard therapy.

Background Morphological assessment and measurement of the residual mass of the breast tumour following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is the key to successful surgical treatment. The objective of our study was to evaluate the efficiency of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) and conventional mammography (MMG) in detecting CR (complete response) following NACT, as well as to compare the efficiency of conventional mammography and contrast-enhanced spectral mammography is assessing the therapeutic response to NACT in breast cancer patients.Methods A retrospective analysis included 63 breast cancer subjects who had undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the years 2016-2019. The inclusion criteria for the study included diagnosed breast cancer based on a core needle biopsy, a complete set of imaging examinations before the procedure consisted of digital mammography, contrast-enhanced spectral mammography and surgery performed before and after completed neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Results The average size of the tumours prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy amounted to 34.37 mm for MMG and 34.34 mm for CESM, as well as 17.61 mm for MMG and 8.48 mm for CESM following NACT. The average size of the lesions in histopathological examination was 11.06 mm. Spearman’s analysis revealed a high level of correlation (R=0.89, p<0.01) upon comparing the maximum tumour dimensions prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy on MMG and CESM, and a moderate level of correlation (R=0.57, p<0.01) upon comparing the maximum tumour dimensions post-NACT on MMG and CESM. While comparing the measurements of the maximum dimensions on MMG and CESM following NACT, with the maximum dimensions in histopathological examination, we can observe a low level of correlation for MMG (R=0.26, p<0.04) and a high level of correlation for CESM (R=0.67, p<0.01). The sensitivity of MMG in forecasting CR amounted to 33.33% and its specificity to 92.86%, whereas the same parameters for CESM were 85.71% and 71.42% respectively.Conclusions CESM demonstrates significantly higher sensitivity than MMG in forecasting CR in female patients receiving NACT due to breast cancer. CESM correlates well with the size of residual lesions in histopathological examination. However, it tends to underestimate the tumour size. In the assessment of post-NACT residual lesions, conventional mammography is an insufficient diagnostic tool.