An asphalt concrete has been modified by adding four polymeric wastes: polyethylene (PE) from micronized containers, polypropylene (PP) from ground caps, polystyrene (PS) from hangers and rubber from end-of-life tyres (ELT). These polymeric wastes were selected according to their availability, homogeneity and economic criteria considering the big amount of material required to build a road. The dry method has been used to modify the bituminous mixture due to its simplicity and the possibility to be carried out in any asphalt plant without important modifications. This is very important in order to spread the process and recycle the polymeric waste in the same place where it is produced, hence improving the environmental impact. The reference asphalt mixture and the four modified asphalt concretes have been analysed separately and their performance compared, evaluating their resistance against plastic deformation, stiffness, fatigue resistance and workability. The Master curve and the Black diagram of the mixtures were also calculated. The results showed that the use of polymeric wastes significantly increased the stiffness of the reference mixture in all cases, but especially when PE, PP and ELT were used. However, none of these materials significantly modifies the fatigue behaviour of the reference mixture. Regarding the resistance against plastic deformation, the use of both PE and ELT led to an increase of the resistance, whereas PP did not modify it and PS decreased it. As for workability, the energy of compaction of the modified mixtures did not suffer any important change. Therefore, according to the results obtained, PE, PP and ELT can be used to modify asphalt mixtures since they improve or do not change their properties. On the other hand, PS should be further studied because of the contradictory results obtained, and only when plastic deformation is not a problem this material could be used.

No abstract

In recent years, the increasing rise in environmental awareness among energy consumers has led to an increasing use of renewable energies such as the geothermal energy. An important role in the efficient exploitation of the geothermal resource is played by the grouting material placed in the borehole between the pipes and the ground. Actually, the use of proper grouts is essential to provide an effective heat transfer between the ground and the heat carrier fluid in the pipes, and also to comply with the mechanical and environmental demands. However, when it comes to the construction of the GHP installations, the grout is especially required to be easy to work with (workable) and for this reason more water than required is sometimes added. In order to assess the suitability of grouting materials with significant water/solid ratios, the thermal conductivity, mechanical strength and permeability of five different grouts and grout-pipe specimens were measured for their laboratory characterization. In addition, the grouts were subjected to heating and cooling cycles to evaluate their durability with time in terms of the potential degradation of the materials and the loss of quality of the grout-pipe interface. According to the results obtained, the grouts here tested are appropriate for most of the geothermal heat pump installations, especially for those with low to medium ground thermal properties.

This paper demonstrates the sustainability of induction-healed asphalt mixtures (HEALROAD) by comparing the impacts this technology causes with those generated by asphalt mixtures maintained by conventional practices such as mill and overlay. The functional unit selected is a 1 km lane with an analysis period of 30 years, and the stages considered are production, construction, maintenance, congestion, leaching and endof-life. Two case studies have been analysed to evaluate the influence of different traffic strategies on the environmental impact of each maintenance alternative. Results show the benefits of using the induction technology at hot points where traffic jams occur.

No abstract