Diagnostic delay in oropharyngeal cancer may be associated with poor prognosis. As controversy exists on this topic because of contradictory results, the aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of the relationship between total diagnostic delay and advanced disease stages. A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and ISI proceedings was made to identify observational studies that provided relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for patients with confirmed pathological diagnosis. The outcome of interest was disease stage (TNM classification), while the exposure of interest was the total diagnostic delay. The study-specific adjusted log RRs for cohort studies were weighted by the inverse of their variance to compute a pooled RR and its 95% CI. The fixed-effects pooled RR of advanced stages of oropharyngeal cancer when diagnostic delay is present was 1.32 (95% CI: 1.07-1.62). This association was stronger when the analysis was restricted to oral cancer (pooled RR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.09-1.99) and when delay was longer than 1 month (pooled RR: 1.69; 95% CI: 1.26-2.77). The probability for patients with delayed diagnosis to present an advanced-stage tumour at diagnosis was significantly higher than that of patients with no delay in diagnosis. However, new prospective studies with strict methodology are needed to shed more light on this association.

Worldwide, oral cancer has one of the lowest survival rates and poor prognosis remains unaffected despite recent therapeutic advances. Reducing diagnostic delay to achieve earlier detection is a cornerstone to improve survival. Thus, intervention strategies to minimize diagnostic delays resulting from patient factors and to identify groups at risk in different geographical areas seem to be necessary. The identification of a 'scheduling delay' in oral cancer justifies the introduction of additional educational interventions aimed at the whole health care team at dental and medical practices. The access to and the kind of healthcare system in a particular country are also relevant in this context, particularly the referral system. The design of a simple, clear, fail-safe, fast-track referral scheme for those suspected with cancer may diminish greatly the length of the delay. Moreover, there is a need for future investigations, which are methodologically adequate, that consider cultural and geographical aspects and use patient survival as the final outcome, that are able to recognize the agents/factors responsible for diagnostic delay by patients as well as healthcare providers and those attributable to the healthcare systems.

A longer time interval from first symptom to referral for diagnosis is a risk factor for advanced stage and mortality of oral cancer. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: E2182-E2189, 2016.

No abstract

No abstract