DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and blocked replication forks resulting from bulky adducts and inhibitors of replication activate the DNA damage response (DDR), a signaling pathway marked by phosphorylation of histone 2AX (H2AX). The phosphorylated form, γH2AX, accumulates at the site of the damage and can be visualized as foci by immunocytochemistry. The objective of this study was to assess if γH2AX is a reliable biomarker for genotoxic exposures. To this end, we selected 14 well-known genotoxic compounds and compared them with 10 nongenotoxic chemicals, using CHO-9 cells because they are well characterized as to DNA repair and DDR. We quantified γH2AX foci manually and automatically. In addition, total γH2AX activation was determined by flow cytometry. For all chemicals the cytotoxic dose response was assayed by a metabolic cytotoxicity assay. We show that (1) all genotoxic agents induced γH2AX dose-dependently whereas nongenotoxic agents do not; (2) γH2AX was observed for genotoxicants in the cytotoxic dose range, revealing a correlation between cytotoxicity and γH2AX for genotoxic agents; for nongenotoxic agents cytotoxicity was not related to γH2AX; (3) manual scoring of γH2AX and automated scoring provided comparable results, the automated scoring was faster and investigator independent; (4) data obtained by foci counting and flow cytometry showed a high correlation, suggesting that γH2AX scoring by flow cytometry has the potential for high-throughput analysis. However, the microscopic evaluation can provide additional information as to foci size, distribution, colocalization and background staining; (5) γH2AX foci were colocalized with 53BP1 and Rad51, supporting the notion that they represent true DSBs. Collectively, the automated analysis of γH2AX foci allows for rapid determination of genetic damage in mammalian cells. The data revealed that the induction of γH2AX by genotoxicants is related to loss of viability and support γH2AX as a reliable bio-indicator for pretoxic DNA damage.

Tryptophan metabolism is a key process that shapes the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. The two rate-limiting enzymes that mediate tryptophan depletion, indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) and tryptophan-2,3-dioxygenase (TDO), have moved into the focus of research and inhibitors targeting IDO and TDO have entered clinical trials. Local tryptophan depletion is generally viewed as the crucial immunosuppressive mechanism. In T cells, the kinase general control non-derepressible 2 (GCN2) has been identified as a molecular sensor of tryptophan deprivation. GCN2 activation by tryptophan depletion induces apoptosis and mitigates T cell proliferation. Here, we investigated whether GCN2 attenuates tumor rejection in experimental B16 melanoma using T cell-specific knockout mice. Our data demonstrate that GCN2 in T cells did not affect immunity to B16 tumors even when animals were treated with antibodies targeting cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA4). GCN2-deficient gp100 TCR-transgenic T cells were equally effective as wild-type pmel T cells against gp100-expressing B16 melanomas after adoptive transfer and gp100 peptide vaccination. Even augmentation of tumoral tryptophan metabolism in B16 tumors by lentiviral overexpression of did not differentially affect GCN2-proficient vs. GCN2-deficient T cells . Importantly, GCN2 target genes were not upregulated in tumor-infiltrating T cells. MALDI-TOF MS imaging of B16 melanomas demonstrated maintenance of intratumoral tryptophan levels despite high tryptophan turnover, which prohibits a drop in tryptophan sufficient to activate GCN2 in tumor-infiltrating T cells. In conclusion, our results do not suggest that suppression of antitumor immune responses by tryptophan metabolism is driven by local tryptophan depletion and subsequent GCN2-mediated T cell anergy.

Tryptophan (Trp) metabolism is an important target in immuno-oncology as it represents a powerful immunosuppressive mechanism hijacked by tumors for protection against immune destruction. However, it remains unclear how tumor cells can proliferate while degrading the essential amino acid Trp. Trp is incorporated into proteins after it is attached to its tRNA by tryptophanyl-tRNA synthestases. As the tryptophanyl-tRNA synthestases compete for Trp with the Trp-catabolizing enzymes, the balance between these enzymes will determine whether Trp is used for protein synthesis or is degraded. In human cancers expression of the Trp-degrading enzymes indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase-1 (IDO1) and tryptophan-2,3-dioxygenase (TDO2) was positively associated with the expression of the tryptophanyl-tRNA synthestase WARS. One mechanism underlying the association between IDO1 and WARS identified in this study is their joint induction by IFNγ released from tumor-infiltrating T cells. Moreover, we show here that IDO1- and TDO2-mediated Trp deprivation upregulates WARS expression by activating the general control non-derepressible-2 (GCN2) kinase, leading to phosphorylation of the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2α (eIF2α) and induction of activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4). Trp deprivation induced cytoplasmic WARS expression but did not increase nuclear or extracellular WARS levels. GCN2 protected the cells against the effects of Trp starvation and enabled them to quickly make use of Trp for proliferation once it was replenished. Computational modeling of Trp metabolism revealed that Trp deficiency shifted Trp flux towards WARS and protein synthesis. Our data therefore suggest that the upregulation of WARS via IFNγ and/or GCN2-peIF2α-ATF4 signaling protects Trp-degrading cancer cells from excessive intracellular Trp depletion.

The development of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is linked to functional changes in synovial fibroblasts (SF) and local infiltration of T lymphocytes. Fibroblasts possess the capacity to suppress T cell responses, although the molecular mechanisms of this suppression remain incompletely understood. In this study, we aimed to define the mechanisms by which noninflammatory SF modulate Th cell responses and to determine the immunosuppressive efficacy of RASF. Hence, the influence of SF from osteoarthritis or RA patients on total Th cells or different Th cell subsets of healthy donors was analyzed in vitro. We show that SF strongly suppressed the proliferation of Th cells and the secretion of IFN-γ in a cell contact-independent manner. In cocultures of SF and Th cells, tryptophan was completely depleted within a few days, resulting in eukaryotic initiation factor 2α phosphorylation, TCRζ-chain downregulation, and proliferation arrest. Blocking IDO1 activity completely restored Th cell proliferation, but not IFN-γ production. Interestingly, only the proliferation of Th1 cells, but not of Th2 or Th17 cells, was affected. Finally, RASF had a significantly lower IDO1 expression and a weaker Th cell suppressive capacity compared with osteoarthritis SF. We postulate that the suppression of Th cell growth by SF through tryptophan catabolism may play an important role in preventing inappropriate Th cell responses under normal conditions. However, expansion of Th17 cells that do not induce IDO1-mediated suppression and the reduced capacity of RASF to restrict Th cell proliferation through tryptophan metabolism may support the initiation and propagation of synovitis in RA patients.