Anal and urinary dysfunctions are usually associated and have a great impact on a woman's QoL. An integrated approach across specialties should lead to improved patient care. Therefore, our study is relevant because it emphasizes the importance of urogynecologists routinely investigating such symptoms. To do so, standardized questionnaires should be included in the evaluation of all these patients.
PFM function assessed by bidigital palpation in postmenopausal women was not sufficiently sensitive to differentiate between women with vs. women without PFM dysfunction and was not related with specific quality of life in women with urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse, respectively. These data should be used to reinforce the widespread recommendation that PFM training is essencial in PFD treatment.
Introduction and Hypothesis: The Pelvic Floor Dysfunction (PFD) is a common gynecological condition that causes significant morbidity in the affected population, increasing clinical and financial challenge for the Public Health Services. Methods: This study aimed to review the available evidence and interventions to promote the health of women with PFD. We used the following databases to select papers for this review: Scopus, PubMed, CINAHL, LILACS and Cochrane. The sample consists of seven articles, with evidence levels 1 and 2. Results: The results of the articles point out to a greater number of activities related to the management of Urinary Incontinence (UI) behavioral support to the patient and physical therapy of the pelvic floor muscles. They were both beneficial to UI prevention and treatment. Conclusions: The physical therapy approach, when associated with cognitive and behavioral strategies, leverages UI outcomes in patients.
Introduction
There is a need of information about transgender individuals and their health needs. This work has as object of study sexual behaviors and social barriers to access health of transgender men. There is a need for information about transgender men and their health needs. Globally, transgender people face discrimination and social exclusion. Available data indicate numerous healthcare inequities between trans and cisgender (non-trans) people.
Objective
The aim of this study was to evaluate transgender men at a public university hospital linked to brazilian´s public healthcare, analyzing sexual practices and barriers to access affirmative care.
Methods
The medical records of seventeen patients (range 18-42 of age) followed between 2016 and 2018, were used to collect data retrospectively and descriptively with quantitative and qualitative approach. Through a structured interview, there was a focus on data concerning difficulties to reach healthcare and medical inequities.
Results
It was noticed that transgender men face social barriers to health access, such as insistent non-respect of the use of the social name, the lack of knowledge of health demands by health professionals and the barriers imposed by family and/or spouse. The sexual practices performed by these men, who proved to be widely diverse and changing, are mostly penetrative (70,58%), and such practices may be passive and / or active. It was also observed variable sexual orientation among the patients, although most of them (88,23%) maintain a relationship with a cisgender woman. Gynecological follow-up was also the subject of discussion in this study, and despite the fact that 23,52% of patients had gynecological complaints, 29,41% had never done a gynecological consultation, being the resistance to do gynecological exams very commun. Only 28,57% of the patients had not yet started hormone therapy, and they declared that they would like to start this process. The majority of transgender men have also the need of body change.
Conclusions
Therefore, it is necessary to develop strategies in public and universal health that are effective to provide transgender men with their need to body change or hormone therapy, as well as to guide them to the gynecological examination. Additionally, health care providers need to guarantee proper and free of prejudice assistance.
Disclosure
No
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.