BackgroundIn general, autologous veins are the optimal replacement material for an infected vascular graft in terms of handling, durability and resistance to reinfection. In the absence of suitable autologous material, several options are available, each of which has specific advantages and drawbacks with regard to these characteristics.MethodsIn recent years, xenogeneic materials (in particular pericardial patches from different species and biosynthetic grafts) have been increasingly used as replacement material in the setting of infections. Bovine and equine pericardial patches are applied in particular as self-made tube grafts in the aortic region and also in infections of iliacofemoral prosthetic grafts and shunt infections.ResultsThe results of small clinical series on durability and resistance to reinfection are promising.ConclusionIt is feasible to use biosynthetic materials to replace infected intracavitary and extracavitary vascular grafts with remarkably low reinfection rates; however, the unique mechanical properties of the grafts as well as the initially increased thrombogenicity, need to be taken into consideration.

Biosynthetic bypass grafts might be valuable to replace infected prosthetic grafts in the absence of a suitable vein. They have excellent re-infection resistance. Limb salvage, morbidity, and the mortality rate are similar to those obtained with autologous vein grafts in infected fields.

▼Purpose: Evaluation of the technical success rate and complications when retrieving dislocated intravascular foreign bodies. Material and Methods: Between 1999 and 2015 38 patients (21 female; 17 male; Age: 17 -92; Average 54.3 years) underwent an extraction of intravascular dislocated foreign bodies, which were not lost during a radiological intervention. The extracted material included 29 port catheters, 3 tips of tunneled dialysis catheters, 2 stents, 2 guide wires, 1 CVC tip and 1 AS occluder device. Various catheters for repositioning and extraction were used. The access was transarterial as well as transvenous. Technical success was defined as complete removal of the foreign body. Results: The technical success rate was 92.1 % (35 of 38). In 17 patients an additional catheter was necessary to reposition the foreign body in order to make it accessible for the extraction catheter. In one case a stent was relocated and remodeled within the patient and was not extracted. In another case we experienced a dislocation of a small fragment of the port catheter into the distal parts of the pulmonary artery, which couldn't be extracted. A guide wire could not be extracted as it was already adhered with the vessel wall. Peri-interventional complications were not documented. Conclusion: The percutaneous extraction of dislocated intravascular foreign bodies is technically successful and poor of complications. Interventional therapy can avoid surgical removal.

No abstract

Our analysis showed good results in octogenarians undergoing tibial and peroneal bypass surgery with regard to patency rates and limb salvage. However, octogenarians had a significantly higher perioperative mortality rate.