SummaryThe reason for RNase E attachment to the inner membrane is largely unknown. To understand the cell biology of RNA degradation, we have characterized a strain expressing RNase E lacking the membrane attachment site (cytoplasmic RNase E). Genome‐wide data show a global slowdown in mRNA degradation. There is no correlation between mRNA stabilization and the function or cellular location of encoded proteins. The activity of cRNase E is comparable to the wild‐type enzyme in vitro, but the mutant protein is unstable in vivo. Autoregulation of cRNase E synthesis compensates for protein instability. cRNase E associates with other proteins to assemble a cytoplasmic RNA degradosome. CsrB/C sRNAs, whose stability is regulated by membrane‐associated CsrD, are stabilized. Membrane attachment of RNase E is thus necessary for CsrB/C turnover. In contrast to mRNA stability, ribosome‐free transcripts are sensitive to inactivation by cRNase E. Our results show that effects on RNA degradation are not due to the differences in the activity or level of cRNase E, or failure to assemble the RNA degradosome. We propose that membrane attachment is necessary for RNase E stability, functional interactions with membrane‐associated regulatory factors and protection of ribosome‐free transcripts from premature interactions with RNase E in the nucleoid.

Programmed ribosomal -1 frameshifting is a non-standard decoding process occurring when ribosomes encounter a signal embedded in the mRNA of certain eukaryotic and prokaryotic genes. This signal has a mandatory component, the frameshift motif: it is either a Z_ZZN tetramer or a X_XXZ_ZZN heptamer (where ZZZ and XXX are three identical nucleotides) allowing cognate or near-cognate repairing to the -1 frame of the A site or A and P sites tRNAs. Depending on the signal, the frameshifting frequency can vary over a wide range, from less than 1% to more than 50%. The present study combines experimental and bioinformatics approaches to carry out (i) a systematic analysis of the frameshift propensity of all possible motifs (16 Z_ZZN tetramers and 64 X_XXZ_ZZN heptamers) in Escherichia coli and (ii) the identification of genes potentially using this mode of expression amongst 36 Enterobacteriaceae genomes. While motif efficiency varies widely, a major distinctive rule of bacterial -1 frameshifting is that the most efficient motifs are those allowing cognate re-pairing of the A site tRNA from ZZN to ZZZ. The outcome of the genomic search is a set of 69 gene clusters, 59 of which constitute new candidates for functional utilization of -1 frameshifting.