Background Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) loss has long been associated with adverse findings in early prostate cancer. Studies to date have yet to employ quantitative methods (qPTEN) for measuring of prognostically relevant amounts of PTEN loss in postsurgical settings and demonstrate its clinical application. Methods PTEN protein levels were measured by immunohistochemistry in radical prostatectomy samples from training (n = 410) and validation (n = 272) cohorts. PTEN loss was quantified per cancer cell and per tissue microarray core. Thresholds for identifying clinically relevant PTEN loss were determined using log-rank statistics in the training cohort. Univariate (Kaplan-Meier) and multivariate (Cox proportional hazards) analyses on various subpopulations were performed to assess biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) and were independently validated. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results PTEN loss in more than 65% cancer cells was most clinically relevant and had statistically significant association with reduced BRFS in training (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.59 to 3.87; P < .001) and validation cohorts (HR = 4.22, 95% CI = 2.01 to 8.83; P < .001). The qPTEN scoring method identified patients who recurred within 5.4 years after surgery (P < .001). In men with favorable risk of biochemical recurrence (Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment – Postsurgical scores <5 and no adverse pathological features), qPTEN identified a subset of patients with shorter BRFS (HR = 5.52, 95% CI = 2.36 to 12.90; P < .001) who may be considered for intensified monitoring and/or adjuvant therapy. Conclusions Compared with previous qualitative approaches, qPTEN improves risk stratification of postradical prostatectomy patients and may be considered as a complementary tool to guide disease management after surgery.
294 Background: PTEN loss is associated with adverse outcomes in prostate cancer and has the potential to be clinically implemented as a prognostic biomarker. Deep learning algorithms applied to digital pathology can provide automated and objective assessment of biomarkers. The objective of this work was to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) system for automated detection and localization of PTEN loss in prostate cancer samples. Methods: Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was used to measure PTEN protein levels on prostate tissue microarrays (TMA) from two institutions (in-house n=272 and external n=125 patients). TMA cores were visually scored for PTEN loss by pathologists and, if present, spatially annotated. In-house cohort (N=1239 cores) were divided into 70/20/10 training/validation/testing sets. Two algorithms were developed: a) Class I=core-based, to label each core for biomarker status and b) Class II=pixel-based, to spatially distinguish areas of PTEN loss within each core. ResNet101 architecture was used to train a multi-resolution ensemble of classifiers at 5x, 10x, and 20x for Class I task and a single classifier at simulated 40x for Class II segmentation. Results: For Class I algorithm, accuracy of PTEN status was 88.3% and 93.4% in validation and testing cohorts, respectively (Table). AI-based probability of PTEN loss was higher in cores with complete loss vs partial loss. Accuracy was improved to 90.7% in validation and 93.5% in test cohorts using the Class II region-based algorithm, with median dice scores 0.833 and 0.831, respectively. Direct application to external set demonstrated a high false positive rate. Loading trained model and conservatively re-training (“fine-tuning”) on 48/320 external cohort cores improved accuracy to 93.4%. Conclusions: Results demonstrate feasibility and robustness for fully automated detection and localization of PTEN loss in prostate cancer tissue samples and possibility for time/cost-effectiveness of sample processing/scoring in research and clinical laboratories.[Table: see text]
Aim To synthesize the evidence about the main intervention characteristics of cognitive behavioral therapies (CBTs) for individuals with cerebral palsy and identify barriers and facilitators to their success, focusing on aspects of feasibility and markers of success. Method A scoping review methodology informed a literature search for papers published between 1991 and 2021. Articles were screened, reviewed, and categorized using the DistillerSR systematic review software, and critically appraised for quantitative and/or qualitative criteria. Results Out of 1265 publications identified, 14 met the inclusion criteria. Elements associated with the specific study participant characteristics (46% female; aged 6–65 years), type of CBT techniques used (third‐wave [n = 6], cognitive [n = 3], cognitive and behavioral [n = 2], biofeedback training [n = 2]), and features of the study context and methodological quality (two randomized clinical trials and small sample sizes [n ≤ 12]), were identified. Most studies had psychological targets of intervention (n = 10) and secondary physiological (n = 3) or social (n = 2) objectives. Feasibility indicators were described in nearly one‐third of the papers. Interpretation This study highlights the high flexibility within CBT interventions, enabling their adaptation for individuals with cerebral palsy. However, relatively little, and only low‐certainty evidence was identified. More high‐quality research in terms of specific CBT techniques, optimal treatment doses, and detailed population characteristics are needed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.