ObjectiveMidstream clean-catch urine is an accepted method to diagnose urinary tract infection but is impracticable in infants before potty training. We tested the bladder stimulation technique to obtain a clean-catch urine sample in infants.Materials and methodsWe included 142 infants under walking age who required a urine sample in a cross- sectional study carried out during a 3-months period, from September to November 2014, in the emergency department of the University Children’s Hospital of Nice (France). A technique based on bladder stimulation and lumbar stimulation maneuvers, with at least two attempts, was tested by four trained physicians. The success rate and time to obtain urine sample within 3 minutes were evaluated. Discomfort (EVENDOL score ≥4/15) was measured. We estimated the risk factors in the failure of the technique. Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test were used to compare frequencies. T-test and Wilcoxon test were used to compare quantitative data according to the normality of the distribution. Risk factors for failure of the technique were evaluated using a multivariate logistic regression model.ResultsWe obtained midstream clean-catch urine in 55.6% of infants with a median time of 52.0 s (10.0; 110.0). The success rate decreased with age from 88.9% (newborn) to 28.6% (>1 y) (p = 0.0001) and with weight, from 85.7% (<4kg) to 28.6% (>10kg) (p = 0.0004). The success rate was 60.8% for infants without discomfort (p<0.0001). Heavy weight and discomfort were associated with failure, with adjusted ORs of 1.47 [1.04–2.31] and 6.65 [2.85–15.54], respectively.ConclusionBladder stimulation seems to be efficient in obtaining midstream urine with a moderate success rate in our study sample. This could be an alternative technique for infants before potty training but further randomized multicenter studies are needed to validate this procedure.
RATIONALE: FPIES is mainly related to cow's milk and manifests as a chronic digestive disease or in its acute form with potentially lifethreatening vomiting/diarrhea/dehydration. The objective of this study is to characterize the clinical features of cow's milk-induced FPIES in children. METHODS: A cohort of patients with FPIES was constituted in French Children's Hospitals (Necker, Paris-Lenval, Nice). Data were collected from medical records including all patients referred for an acute episode of FPIES, and divided into 2 groups according to their tolerance of extensively hydrolysed formula (eHF) or their need to be fed an amino-acid formula (AAF). RESULTS: 49 children were enrolled. Chronic had occurred in 36 (73%), after a median period of 10 days following introduction of milkbased formula. In the whole group, the acute episode occurred at a median age of 4 months. Allergy testing was rarely positive: patch test 21 (51%), skin prick tests 3 (8%), specific IgE 13 (30%). Recovery was observed in 19 (40%) at a median age of 31 months. The eHF group comprised 24 (49%) infants and the AAF one 25 (51%). They exhibited the following significant or trend towards significance differences : number of hospitalizations before diagnosis per patient 0,9 vs 2,7 (p50,02), age of FA diagnosis 4,5 months vs 2,8 (p50,04), food tolerance acquisition 54% vs 24% (p50,02), associated FA 4% vs 48% (p50,0002). CONCLUSIONS: Half infants with milk-induced FPIES do not tolerate eHF, and need to be fed with an AAF, a condition associated with a delayed diagnosis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.