Objective This study aimed to determine which bariatric procedure allows patients to obtain the best weight‐loss outcomes and a remission of type 2 diabetes. Methods Databases were searched for randomized‐controlled trials comparing Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass (RYGB) with sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or one‐anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB). The mean difference (MD) or the relative risk was determined. Results Twenty‐five randomized‐controlled trials were analyzed. Excess weight loss (EWL, percentage) was greater for RYGB patients at 3 years (MD: 11.93, p < 0.00001) and 5 years (MD: 13.11, p = 0.0004). Higher excess BMI loss (percentage) was found in RYGB at 1 year (MD: 11.66, p = 0.01). Total weight loss (percentage) was greater for RYGB patients after 3 months (MD: 2.41, p = 0.02), 6 months (MD: 3.83, p < 0.00001), 1 year (MD: 6.35, p < 0.00001), and 5 years (MD: 3.90, p = 0.005). No difference in terms of remission of type 2 diabetes was seen between RYGB and SG. EWL was significantly more important after OAGB than after RYGB after 1 year (MD: −10.82, p = 0.003). Conclusions RYGB is more efficient than SG in the midterm. OAGB offers greater EWL than RYGB after 1 year, but further evidence is needed to confirm this result.

Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) is a very common condition, with an annual incidence ranging from 0.1% to 0.3% and a lifetime prevalence ranging from 5% to 10%. If not treated, it can lead to severe complications such as gastro-intestinal bleeding, perforation, or entero-biliary fistula. Entero-biliary fistulas and especially choledocho-duodenal fistula (CDF) are a rare, but relevant and important diagnosis, which can lead to several complications such as gastric outlet obstruction, bleeding, perforation, or recurrent cholangitis. In this article, we present the case of an 85-year-old woman with PUD complicated with gastro-intestinal bleeding and a CDF. We also performed a review of the literature to search for pre-existing cases with this atypical clinical presentation. The aim was to raise awareness among surgeons and clinicians by offering a summary of different types of entero-biliary and especially CDF, existing diagnostic investigations, and management.

Aim Caecal diverticulitis (CD) is an uncommon condition which can be misdiagnosed as acute appendicitis due to similar clinical presentations. Further, its management varies among medical centres. The aim of this study was to review cases of patients with CD, to identify the factors differentiating CD from acute appendicitis and to provide a summary of existing diagnostic methods and therapeutic alternatives regarding its management. Methods This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines and the AMSTAR2 checklist. We searched MEDLINE and Embase from inception until 1 October 2018 for original publications reporting cases of CD. Results Out of the 560 identified studies, 146 publications (988 patients) were included in the qualitative synthesis. Most frequent symptoms of CD were right iliac fossa pain (93.2%), nausea and/or vomiting (35.4%) and fever (26.9%). A total of 443 patients (44.8%) underwent radiological imaging, which reported CD in 225 patients (22.8%). For the other patients, the diagnosis was obtained by surgical exploration (73.9%). Among patients diagnosed with CD by imaging, 67 (29.8%) underwent surgery and 158 (70.2%) were treated conservatively. Among patients who underwent surgical exploration, treatment consisted most frequently of right hemi‐colectomy (33%), appendectomy (18.8%) and diverticulectomy with appendectomy (16.3%). Conclusion CD can be misdiagnosed as acute appendicitis, therefore resulting in unnecessary surgical exploration. The review of the literature starting from 1930 highlights the critical role of medical imaging in supporting the clinician to diagnose this condition and administer adequate treatment.

No abstract

Background: Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is a common hospital admission diagnosis. Identification of patients who will require a surgical resection because of a nonviable small bowel remains a challenge. Through a prospective cohort study, the authors aimed to validate risk factors and scores for intestinal resection, and to develop a practical clinical score designed to guide surgical versus conservative management. Patients and Methods: All patients admitted for an acute SBO between 2004 and 2016 in the center were included. Patients were divided in three categories depending on the management: conservative, surgical with bowel resection, and surgical without bowel resection. The outcome variable was small bowel necrosis. Logistic regression models were used to identify the best predictors. Results: Seven hundred and thirteen patients were included in this study, 492 in the development cohort and 221 in the validation cohort. Sixty-seven percent had surgery, of which 21% had small bowel resection. Thirty-three percent were treated conservatively. Eight variables were identified with a strong association with small bowel resection: age 70 years of age and above, first episode of SBO, no bowel movement for greater than or equal to 3 days, abdominal guarding, C-reactive protein greater than or equal to 50, and three abdominal computer tomography scanner signs: small bowel transition point, lack of small bowel contrast enhancement, and the presence of greater than 500 ml of intra-abdominal fluid. Sensitivity and specificity of this score were 65 and 88%, respectively, and the area under the curve was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.80–0.89). Conclusion: The authors developed and validated a practical clinical severity score designed to tailor management of patients presenting with an SBO.