Ten orthodontists were asked to diagnose the number of impacted upper canines and the number of resorbed lateral and/or central incisor roots in 30 panoramic radiographs (P1) from 30 patients. In order to objectify these diagnoses, transversal CT images of all 30 patients were examined in addition. Addition of the recordings in the 30 patients revealed that the 10 orthodontists had diagnosed 350 impacted/displaced canines. On comparison of the P1 and CT results, the latter revealed that, in fact, 390 canines were impacted or displaced, not just 350. Addition of the recordings further showed that, based on P1, the investigators had diagnosed 73 resorptions in the 1,200 incisors examined. However, the CT showed 160 resorptions; this corresponds to a sensitivity value of 45.6%. The CT showed 1,040 incisors with no resorptions, whereas the investigators diagnosed only 925 teeth as not resorbed in the P1. The specificity was thus 88.9%. These results show that, due to their low reliability, panoramic radiographs are not an appropriate means of diagnosing resorptions in front teeth in connection with impacted canines.