Introduction:This study was designed as a clinical trial to evaluate and compare the regenerative potential of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), and blood clot in immature necrotic permanent teeth with or without associated apical periodontitis.Methods:Access preparation was done under rubber dam isolation. Copious irrigation was done with 2.5% NaOCl and triple antibiotic paste was placed as an intracanal medicament. After 4 weeks, the cases were divided into four groups with five patients in each group. The study design had three test arms and one control arm. Group I in which mineral trioxide aggregate apexification was carried out and it was kept as control group to evaluate the regenerative potential of blood clot and platelet concentrates, Group II in which blood clot was used as scaffold in the canal, Group III in PRF was used as scaffold, and Group IV in which PRP carried on collagen was used as a scaffold.Results:The clinical and radiographic evaluation after 6 and 18 months was done by two independent observers who were blinded from the groups. The scoring was done as: None score was denoted by, Fair by 1, Good by 2, and Excellent by 3. The data were then analyzed statistically by Fisher's exact test using Statistics and Data 11.1(PRP Using harvest Smart PReP2) which showed statistically significant values in Group III as compared to other Groups.Conclusion:PRF has huge potential to accelerate the growth characteristics in immature necrotic permanent teeth as compared to PRP and blood clot.
Summary Background Effect of seasonality on acne and acne flare has varied interpretations depending on the geographical area of study. In tropical areas, factors like high temperature and humidity may cause acne flares. Aims To assess the seasonal variation of acne in patients and to correlate it with the monthly temperature and humidity over a period of 1 year. Methods A cross‐sectional study of acne patients was conducted for one year. The patient's acne was graded. Patients were specifically questioned about aggravation, improvement, or no change in their acne with respect to the seasons. The mean temperature and humidity of each month in Delhi were compared with grade of acne. This variation in acne was correlated with the temperature and humidity. A P‐value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results Out of 171 patients, 82 (47.95%) patients reported seasonal variation in their acne. Among them, 69 patients (40.4%) reported aggravation in summer. Eleven (6.42%) and 2 (1.16%) patients reported aggravation in winter and rainy season, respectively. The aggravation in summer as compared to rainy and winter season was statistically significant. The mean temperature and mean humidity significantly varied with seasonal aggravation of acne. Conclusions Both temperature and humidity have a contributing role in pathogenesis of acne and are causes of acne flare. In our study, aggravation of acne was more in summer and rainy season.
These findings suggest that at PDAI ≥ 7, every incremental increase in PDAI had a smaller detrimental impact on QoL. For the ABSIS, there was no significant difference in slopes before and after a given score, along with a higher P-value overall. Our results support previous findings 6 that the PDAI is superior to the ABSIS at capturing disease severity, especially at the lower end of disease activity (Figure 1c,d).To significantly improve QoL for patients with mucosal and nonmucosal PV, complete disease clearance may be necessary. Small amounts of worsening activity have an increasingly significant impact on QoL at the lower end of the spectrum. Above mild levels of activity, increasing activity has linear but detrimental smaller effects on QoL. The findings for patients with mucosal PV further support this, likely because oral erosions are painful and impact eating. Consistent with prior findings, 2 the Skindex-S best correlates with PDAI score in all patients.A notable limitation of this study is that our population had milder disease, with a median PDAI of 6Á75 and ABSIS of 11Á75. However, we are still able to show a change in QoL as the PDAI decreases, even at lower PDAI levels. Our findings have important clinical implications in determining appropriate outcomes for therapies. 7 Unlike dermatomyositis and systemic lupus erythematosus, 4 in patients with PV, complete clearance should be the goal.
Background Sunscreens have long been an indispensable part in treating melasma as ancillary agents. None of previous studies have evaluated the role of sunscreens alone in the improvement of melasma. Aims Our objective was to study the role of broad‐spectrum sunscreen with sun protection factor 19 and PA+++ as the sole agent for improvement of melasma. Methods A total of 100 patients with melasma were included in the study. Following proper method of application of 3 mL sunscreen, thrice daily, Melasma Area Severity Score (MASI) and Hindi language version of the MELASQOL scale (Hi‐MELAQOL) was done at baseline and 12 weeks. Results The mean MASI in the study group at the beginning and at the end of the study was 12.38 ± 14.7 and 9.15 ± 4.7, respectively, whereas the mean value of Hi‐MELASQOL at the beginning and at the end of the study was 47.2 ± 14 and 38.1 ± 14.2, respectively. The differences of both were statistically significant. Spearman's correlation between MASI and Hi‐MELASQOL before and after the study was positive but insignificant. Conclusion There was both an objective and subjective improvement in melasma after 12 weeks of sunscreen use in terms of both MASI, showing an objective improvement of melasma after using sunscreens alone and also in Hi‐MELASQOL showing that use of sunscreens significantly improved quality of life of melasma patients. In our study, we have attempted to re‐instate the importance of sunscreens to patients and dermatologists who are inclining more toward various skin lightening agents for treatment of melasma, which have many side effects.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.