No abstract

ObjectiveLittle is known about the effects of psychodrama group therapy on the level of stress, anxiety and depression of the group members, and the biological markers of stress. The aim of this study test cortisol level as a biological reflection of some mental characteristics gained by the psychodrama method in coping with stress. MethodsDepressive patients aged between 18 and 65 years, who diagnosed with depression according to DSM-5, without psychiatric comorbidity, who do not use drugs and were available for psychodrama were enrolled into the study. These patients were evaluated using the Perceived Stress Scale, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and Beck Depression Inventory. In order to observe the circadian rhythm of cortisol, samples were collected from the participants before lunch, before dinner and before going to sleep on the day before psychodrama and on the 0, 15th, and 30th minutes after awakening in the morning of the psychodrama day; as well as just before and after the psychodrama session. Saliva cortisol level just before the initial session of psychodrama group therapy was compared with the saliva cortisol level just after the last psychodrama session at the end of 16 weeks. ResultsStatistically significant difference was determined between the scores of perceived stress scale, STAI-1, STAI-2, beck depression inventory and salivary cortisol level before and after psychodrama session. There was significant decrease in both the scale scores and salivary cortisol after vs. before psychodrama. ConclusionThis results is important as it shows the biological aspect of clinical improvement. Further studies would provide us with better understanding of the effects of psychodrama group psychotherapy on depressive mood and biological projections by means of short-term and long-term follow-up studies.

No abstract

No abstract

Grief mania that is evaluated as psychogenic mania in the literature is related to manic episode that emerges after the loss of a loved one. There are not many cases that associate causality of beginning of mania and mourning in the literature. It is known that mania is induced by traumatic events but the cases that do not suit stages of development of grief process are evaluated as pathological grief. In this case, the woman who experienced manic episode after her son's death is presented. This case is prepared because mania should be considered as possible grief reaction. Case presentation: A patient who is 40 years old, married, mother of 4 children is brought by relatives because of aggressiveness, tension, insomnia for 4 days, fast and talk a lot and nonsense laughing attacks. She was presented to hospital for stressful life events 2 years ago and started to be on medication (escitalopram 10 mg) because of depression and fibromiyaliji diagnosis. She used medication for 1.5 years and she did not use any medication for the last 6months. There is no history for mental disorder in her family. Psychological examination: her interest for the environment was increased, self-care ability got better, her temperament was cheerful, her sociability was respectful, amount of talking and tone of voice increased, mimic and gesture was appropriate for her temperament, sleeping decreased, thought flow increased and achieved goal of conversation late. Moreover, there were grandiose delusions and hypervigilance, affect was close to euphoria, her psychomotor behaviours increased and social functioning decreased. According to biochemical and radiological workup, there was no pathological situation. The client started to use Lithium 900 mg/day and Olanzapin 10 mg/day because of the bipolar disorder diagnosis. The patient's blood lithium level was 0.8mEq/L and lithium was used 1200 mg/day and then 10 days later the patient's blood lithium level was 0.72 mEq/L. According to clinical observations, the patient's manic symptoms remained. Furthermore, the patient started to cry occasionally after 1 month and her grandiosity disappeared. The patient was discharged from the hospital after 45 days. The patient met the criteria for manic episode in DSM 5. The patient did not take any medication for last 6 months. Thus, it is considered that this situation was not induced by medication. It puts the patient into risk group because she was treated for depression before but it is not considered as bipolar depression because there were psychiatric history in the family and depression that experienced 2 years ago was related to stressful life events. It is considered that this case experienced grief/funeral mania because there was contiguity between loss of her son and manic episode, the patient did not react this way to previous challenging life events and the patient was outside of the ordinary 5 stages of grief process.