In a preclinical model, HP-SD ablation (90 W/4 s, T ≤65°C) produced an improved lesion-to-lesion uniformity, linear contiguity, and transmurality at a similar safety profile of conventional ablation.
Background
An in-vivo animal thigh model is the standard technique for
evaluation of ablation catheter technologies, including efficacy and safety of ablation.
However, the biophysics of ablation in a thigh model may not be similar to a beating
heart.
Objective
The aim of this study was to compare efficacy and safety of ablation between a
thigh preparation model and a beating heart.
Methods
In 7 swine, radiofrequency (RF) ablation using a 3.5mm open irrigated catheter
(Thermocool Smart Touch®) was performed sequentially in a thigh
muscle and in-vivo beating ventricles. Ablation was performed at low (30W for 40Ssec)
and high (40W for 60Sec) energy settings and at similar contact force. Ablation lesions
were scanned in high-resolution and measured using electronic calipers.
Results
A total of 152 RF ablation lesions were measured (86 thigh and 66 heart). At
low-energy, lesion width was greater in the thigh model (12.19±1.8mm vs.
8.99±2.1mm; p<0.001) while lesion depth was similar between the thigh
and heart (5.71±0.8mm vs. 5.95±1.3mm, respectively; p=0.18). The
planar cross-sectional lesion area was greater in the thigh model (thigh
54.8±10.8mm2 vs. heart 43.1±16.1mm2;
p<0.001). At high-energy setting, lesion depth, width, and area were all greater
in the thigh model (thigh 91.5±16.8mm2 vs. heart
56.0±15.5mm2; p<0.001). The incidence of steam pop and char
formation was similar between the models.
Conclusion
The thigh preparation model is a reasonable technique for evaluation of
ablation catheter technology, however it often results in overestimation of lesion size,
especially at higher energy settings.
Delivery of high-power short-duration RF energy applications, facilitated by a novel ablation catheter system equipped with advanced TC technology, is feasible, safe, and results in the formation of effective ablation lesions.
Background
- Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a nonthermal energy with potential safety advantages over radiofrequency ablation (RFA). This study investigated a novel PFA system- a circular multielectrode catheter ("PFA lasso") and a multichannel generator designed to work with Carto 3® mapping system.
Methods
- A 7.5F bidirectional circular catheter with 10 electrodes and variable expansion was designed for PFA (biphasic, 1800 Volts). This study included a total of 16 swine utilized to investigate the following 3 experimental aims: Aim 1 examined the feasibility to create a right atrial ablation line of block from the superior vena cava (SVC) to the inferior vena cava (IVC). Aim 2 examined the effect of PFA on lesion maturation including durability after a 30-day survival period. Aim 3 examined the effect of high intensity PFA (10 applications) on esophageal and phrenic nerve tissue in comparison to normal intensity RFA (1-2 applications). Histopathological analysis of all cardiac, esophageal and phrenic nerve tissue was performed.
Results
- Acute line of block was achieved in 12/12 swine (100%) and required a total PFA time of 14 sec (IQR:9-24.5) per line. Ablation line durability after 28&3 days was maintained in 11/12 (91.7%) swine. PFA resulted in transmural lesions in 179/183 (97.8%) sections and a median lesion width of 14.2mm. High intensity PFA (9 [IQR:8-14] application) had no effect on the esophagus while standard intensity RFA (1.5 [IQR:1-2] applications) resulted in deep esophageal tissue injury involving the muscularis propria and adventitia layers. High intensity PFA (16 [IQR:10-28] applications) has no effect on phrenic nerve function and structure while standard dose RFA (1.5 [IQR:1-2] applications) resulted in acute phrenic nerve paralysis.
Conclusions
- In this preclinical model, a multielectrode circular catheter and multichannel generator produced durable atrial lesions with lower vulnerability to esophageal or phrenic nerve damage.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.