Mapping of high-throughput sequencing (HTS) reads to a single arbitrary reference genome is a frequently used approach in microbial genomics. However, the choice of a reference may represent a source of errors that may affect subsequent analyses such as the detection of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and phylogenetic inference. In this work, we evaluated the effect of reference choice on short-read sequence data from five clinically and epidemiologically relevant bacteria (Klebsiella pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophila, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Serratia marcescens). Publicly available whole-genome assemblies encompassing the genomic diversity of these species were selected as reference sequences, and read alignment statistics, SNP calling, recombination rates, dN/dS ratios, and phylogenetic trees were evaluated depending on the mapping reference. The choice of different reference genomes proved to have an impact on almost all the parameters considered in the five species. In addition, these biases had potential epidemiological implications such as including/excluding isolates of particular clades and the estimation of genetic distances. These findings suggest that the single reference approach might introduce systematic errors during mapping that affect subsequent analyses, particularly for data sets with isolates from genetically diverse backgrounds. In any case, exploring the effects of different references on the final conclusions is highly recommended.
16 Mapping of high-throughput sequencing (HTS) reads to a single arbitrary reference genome is a 17 frequently used approach in microbial genomics. However, the choice of a reference may represent a 18 source of errors that may affect subsequent analyses such as the detection of single nucleotide 19 polymorphisms (SNPs) and phylogenetic inference. In this work, we evaluated the effect of reference 20 choice on short-read sequence data from five clinically and epidemiologically relevant bacteria 21 (Klebsiella pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophila, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa 22 and Serratia marcescens). Publicly available whole-genome assemblies encompassing the genomic 23 diversity of these species were selected as reference sequences, and read alignment statistics, SNP 24 calling, recombination rates, dN/dS ratios, and phylogenetic trees were evaluated depending on the 25 mapping reference. The choice of different reference genomes proved to have an impact on almost all 26 the parameters considered in the five species. In addition, these biases had potential epidemiological 27 implications such as including/excluding isolates of particular clades and the estimation of genetic 28 distances. These findings suggest that the single reference approach might introduce systematic errors 29 during mapping that affect subsequent analyses, particularly for data sets with isolates from 30 genetically diverse backgrounds. In any case, exploring the effects of different references on the final 31 conclusions is highly recommended. 32 33 Author summary 34 Mapping consists in the alignment of reads (i.e., DNA fragments) obtained through high-throughput 35 genome sequencing to a previously assembled reference sequence. It is a common practice in genomic 36 studies to use a single reference for mapping, usually the 'reference genome' of a species -a high-37 quality assembly. However, the selection of an optimal reference is hindered by intrinsic intra-species 38 genetic variability, particularly in bacteria. Biases/errors due to reference choice for mapping in 39 bacteria have been identified. These are mainly originated in alignment errors due to genetic 40 differences between the reference genome and the read sequences. Eventually, they could lead to 41 misidentification of variants and biased reconstruction of phylogenetic trees (which reflect ancestry 42 between different bacterial lineages). However, a systematic work on the effects of reference choice 43 in different bacterial species is still missing, particularly regarding its impact on phylogenies. This 44 work intended to fill that gap. The impact of reference choice has proved to be pervasive in the five 45 bacterial species that we have studied and, in some cases, alterations in phylogenetic trees could lead 46 to incorrect epidemiological inferences. Hence, the use of different reference genomes may be 47 prescriptive to assess the potential biases of mapping. 48 49 Introduction 50 The development and increasing availability of high-throughput sequen...
Lactococcus garvieae is a well-known pathogen of fish, but is rarely involved in infections in humans and other mammals. In humans, the main clinical manifestation of L. garvieae infections is endocarditis usually related to the ingestion of contaminated food, such as undercooked fish and shellfish. This study presents the first complete genomic sequence of a clinical L. garvieae strain isolated from a patient with endocarditis and its comparative analysis with other genomes. This human isolate contains a circular chromosome of 2 099 060 bp and one plasmid of 50 557 bp. In comparison with other fully sequenced L. garvieae strains, the chromosomal DNA of L. garvieae Lg-Granada carries a low proportion of insertion sequence elements and a higher number of putative prophages. Our results show that, in general, L. garvieae is a highly recombinogenic species with an open pangenome in which almost 30 % of its genome has undergone horizontal transfers. Within the genus Lactococcus, L. lactis is the main donor of genetic components to L. garvieae but, taking Lg-Granada as a representative, this bacterium tends to import more genes from Bacilli taxa than from other Lactococcus species.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.