The Markov Reward Model Checker (MRMC) is a software tool for verifying properties over probabilistic models. It supports PCTL and CSL model checking, and their reward extensions. Distinguishing features of MRMC are its support for computing time-and reward-bounded reachability probabilities, (property-driven) bisimulation minimization, and precise on-the-fly steady-state detection. Recent tool features include time-bounded reachability analysis for uniform CTMDPs and CSL model checking by discrete-event simulation. This paper presents the tool's current status and its implementation details. This research was performed as part of the MC=MC project financed by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) and the DFG Research Training Group 623 on Leistungsgarantien für Rechnersysteme. We thank Maneesh Khattri (Oxford Univ.), Christina Jansen (RWTH Aachen), and Tim Kemna (Univ. Twente) for their implementation efforts.
The Markov Reward Model Checker (MRMC) is a software tool for verifying properties over probabilistic models. It supports PCTL and CSL model checking, and their reward extensions. Distinguishing features of MRMC are its support for computing time-and reward-bounded reachability probabilities, (property-driven) bisimulation minimization, and precise on-the-fly steady-state detection. Recent tool features include time-bounded reachability analysis for uniform CTMDPs and CSL model checking by discrete-event simulation. This paper presents the tool's current status and its implementation details.
Abstract. This paper studies the effect of bisimulation minimisation in model checking of monolithic discrete-time and continuous-time Markov chains as well as variants thereof with rewards. Our results show that-as for traditional model checking-enormous state space reductions (up to logarithmic savings) may be obtained. In contrast to traditional model checking, in many cases, the verification time of the original Markov chain exceeds the quotienting time plus the verification time of the quotient. We consider probabilistic bisimulation as well as versions thereof that are tailored to the property to be checked.
This paper studies the efficiency of several probabilistic model checkers by comparing verification times and peak memory usage for a set of standard case studies. The study considers the model checkers ETMCC, MRMC, PRISM (sparse and hybrid mode), YMER and VESTA, and focuses on fully probabilistic systems. Several of our experiments show significantly different run times and memory consumptions between the tools-up to various orders of magnitude-without, however, indicating a clearly dominating tool. For statistical model checking YMER clearly prevails whereas for the numerical tools MRMC and PRISM (sparse) are rather close. This research has been partially funded by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) under FOCUS/BRICKS grant numbers 642.000.505 (MOQS) and 612.000.311 (MC=MC); the EU under grant number IST-004527 (ARTIST2); the DFG/NWO bilateral cooperation programme under project number DN 62-600 (VOSS2); and by the DFG Research Training Group 1298 (AlgoSyn).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.