The aim of the work is to identify the main directions of the transformation of the legislative process in the context of its informatization and development of proposals for the adjustment of such a transformation. The systematic considedring of changes in the legislative process under the influence of its informatization is a complex and multifaceted practical and theoretical problem. This study is an attempt to propose specific optimization options and at the same time inductively determine the general patterns in the field under study. As a result of the study, the limits of informatization of the legislative process as such in which the final decisions are always made by the person are identified, the current trends in the development of individual stages and off-stage elements of lawmaking are identified. The conclusion is made about the spontaneity of informatization of the legislative process, suggestions for its development at each stage are given, the position on the prematureness of the discussion about the emergence of new stages of the process under study as a result of informatization is formulated. The work was supported by Russian Science Foundation (project №18-78-10075).

No abstract

The article examines the main areas of the system of implementing the rights and obligations of economic entities that have significant transformational potential, identifies and systematizes the key areas of development and problems in these areas, and suggests options for further optimizing development. The article summarizes specific areas where reforms are already taking place, analyzes the latest legislative changes in these areas and the results of their testing, and draws conclusions about the main directions of the state's legislative thought. The work was supported by Russian Science Foundation (project №18-78-10075).

Introduction: the stability of the constitution is a special kind of stability, because if its relevance to rapidly changing social relations is usually fundamentally important for a normative act, then the constitution is largely designed to restrain the paroxysms of social development, carry the values of society through time and preserve the main directions of its development. The study attempts to give an answer about the prerequisite for the most natural and correct change of the constitutional act, despite the fact that, ultimately, it may depend on the specific conditions of constitutionalism in each individual country. Methods: the methodological framework for the research is a set of methods of scientific cognition, among which the main ones are the method of analysis and the system method. Results: the imperative of necessity and prerequisites for the reform of constitutional acts are formulated, the logic and inevitability of the 2020 constitutional reform in Russia are noted, and at the same time, its internal features, which in the future may increase the frequency of constitutional changes. The conclusions are drawn that the stability of the constitutional act should not mean its immutability at all; the answer to the question about the prerequisite for the most natural and correct amendment of the constitutional act depends on the interpretation of the essence of the constitution: if the constitution is a normative act of the highest legal force, then the constitutional text will lose any degree of conformity with the needs of society and the state; if it is a social contract, then the conditions of the latter will be changed by its participants; if it is the act of fixing the alignment of political forces, then there will be a change in such an alignment; if it is a “change management tool”, then there will be a change in the “core of consent”; in each of the above interpretations of the essence of the constitutions, the time for changing the domestic Basic law, apparently by 2020, has really come, and therefore, the 2020 constitutional reform, despite the ambiguity of its assessments, is a logical development of the state in Russia.

Предметом исследования является стабильность как философская категория, актуализированная к социальным наукам, в первую очередь, к праву. Сделан вывод о том, что большинство социальных систем имеют открытый и диссипативный характер, в оптимальном состоянии им свойственна динамическая стабильность. Автором выявлены признаки динамически стабильной социальной системы: самоидентичность, относительное постоянство элементов, разумная интенсивность изменений, адаптивность. Таким образом, динамическая стабильность социальной системы означает сохранение ей устойчивости, то есть адаптивной и разумной интенсивности изменений при сохранении самоидентичности и относительного постоянства элементов, в определенной временной перспективе.