While CBA/J mice fail to be permissive to Leishmania amazonensis-driven pathogenic processes, they heal easily following Leishmania major infection. The early-phase events are crucial to the outcome of Leishmania infection and it is known that macrophages (Mphi) are important in infection control. In the present study we investigated the role of Mphi in driving CBA/J susceptibility to L. amazonensis. We performed kinetic studies and compared the capacity of L. amazonensis and L. major to infect Mphi. There was no difference in percentages of infection or parasite burden for 6 h between the two groups. In contrast, after 12 h we observed that infection was about twice as high in L. amazonensis- than in L. major-infected Mphi. In addition, rIFN-gamma added to the cultures induced nitric oxide (NO) production, and did not modify L. amazonensis infection, although the percentage of L. major infection was significantly reduced. This reduction in L. major infection is a TNF-alpha dependent mechanism as L. major-infected Mphi expressed twice as much TNF-alpha mRNA as L. amazonensis-infected cells, and anti-TNF-alpha reversed the IFN-gamma effect. Moreover, rTNF-alpha plus IFN-gamma were able to significantly reduce the percentage of L. amazonensis-infected cells but not to the same extent as in L. major infection. Despite having higher NO production than IFN-gamma-treated cells, AMG addition to IFN-gamma-plus TNF-alpha-treated cells only partially reversed the inhibition in L. major, but not in L. amazonensis infection. Thus, in this study, we demonstrated that L. amazonensis both inactivated and resisted innate and IFN-gamma-induced Mphi killing mechanisms, indicating that the nature of the parasite and its interaction with Mphi could determine immune response polarization.
BackgroundThe experimental murine model of leishmaniasis has been widely used to characterize the immune response against Leishmania. CBA mice develop severe lesions, while C57BL/6 present small chronic lesions under L. amazonensis infection. Employing a transcriptomic approach combined with biological network analysis, the gene expression profiles of C57BL/6 and CBA macrophages, before and after L. amazonensis infection in vitro, were compared. These strains were selected due to their different degrees of susceptibility to this parasite.ResultsThe genes expressed by C57BL/6 and CBA macrophages, before and after infection, differ greatly, both with respect to absolute number as well as cell function. Uninfected C57BL/6 macrophages express genes involved in the deactivation pathway of macrophages at lower levels, while genes related to the activation of the host immune inflammatory response, including apoptosis and phagocytosis, have elevated expression levels. Several genes that participate in the apoptosis process were also observed to be up-regulated in C57BL/6 macrophages infected with L. amazonensis, which is very likely related to the capacity of these cells to control parasite infection. By contrast, genes involved in lipid metabolism were found to be up-regulated in CBA macrophages in response to infection, which supports the notion that L. amazonensis probably modulates parasitophorous vacuoles in order to survive and multiply in host cells.ConclusionThe transcriptomic profiles of C57BL/6 macrophages, before and after infection, were shown to be involved in the macrophage pathway of activation, which may aid in the control of L. amazonensis infection, in contrast to the profiles of CBA cells.
Recent studies have demonstrated that communication takes place between the autophagic and phagocytic pathways, indicating that the convergence of these two pathways plays an important role in the innate immune response against intracellular microbes. The present study investigated the effect of autophagic induction on the phagocytic capacity of murine macrophages. Autophagy induced by physiological and pharmacological means was shown to reduce the phagocytic capacity of murine macrophages, regardless of cell origin or the nature of the phagocytosed particles themselves. This autophagic inhibitory effect on phagocytosis was shown to be an early and reversible event that results in no loss of cell viability. Furthermore, the data presented herein demonstrate that the induction of autophagy does not affect a macrophage's capacity to recognize and bind to particles, indicating that autophagy does not inhibit the particle recognition process, even though particle internalization is suppressed. The findings herein support the notion that phagocytosis and autophagy may be interdependent and complementary processes.
CBA/J mice are resistant to Leishmania major infection but are permissive to L. amazonensis infection. In addition, CBA/J macrophages control L. major but not L. amazonensis infection in vitro. Phagocytosis by macrophages is known to determine the outcome of Leishmania infection. Pattern recognition receptors (PRR) adorning antigen presenting cell surfaces are known to coordinate the link between innate and adaptive immunity. The macrophage receptor with collagenous structure (MARCO) is a PRR that is preferably expressed by macrophages and is capable of binding Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. No research on the role of MARCO in Leishmania-macrophage interactions has been reported. Here, we demonstrate, for the first time, that MARCO expression by CBA/J macrophages is increased in response to both in vitro and in vivo L. major infections, but not to L. amazonensis infection. In addition, a specific anti-MARCO monoclonal antibody reduced L. major infection of macrophages by 30%-40% in vitro. The draining lymph nodes of anti-MARCO-treated mice displayed a reduced presence of immunolabelled parasite and parasite antigens, as well as a reduced inflammatory response. These results support the hypothesis that MARCO has a role in macrophage infection by L. major in vitro as well as in vivo.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.