The beneficial actions of nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) can be associated with inhibition of cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 whereas their harmful side effects are associated with inhibition of COX-1. Here we report data from two related assay systems, the human whole blood assay and a modified human whole blood assay (using human A549 cells as a source of COX-2). This assay we refer to as the William Harvey Modified Assay. Our aim was to make meaningful comparisons of both classical NSAIDs and newer COX-2-selective compounds. These comparisons of the actions of >40 NSAIDs and novel COX-2-selective agents, including celecoxib, rofecoxib and diisopropyl fluorophosphate, demonstrate a distribution of compound selectivities toward COX-1 that aligns with the risk of serious gastrointestinal complications. In conclusion, this full in vitro analysis of COX-1/2 selectivities in human tissues clearly supports the theory that inhibition of COX-1 underlies the gastrointestinal toxicity of NSAIDs in man.
Acetaminophen is one of the most commonly used drugs for the safe and effective treatment of pain and fever. Acetaminophen works by lowering cyclo-oxygenase products preferentially in the central nervous system, where oxidant stress is strictly limited. However, the precise mechanism of action for acetaminophen on cyclo-oxygenase activity is debated. Two theories prevail. First, it is suggested that acetaminophen selectively inhibits a distinct form of cyclo-oxygenase, cyclo-oxygenase-3. Second, it is suggested that acetaminophen has no affinity for the active site of cyclo-oxygenase but instead blocks activity by reducing the active oxidized form of cyclo-oxygenase to an inactive form. Here, we have used an in vitro model of cyclo-oxygenase-2 activity (A549 cells stimulated with IL-1beta) to show that acetaminophen is an effective inhibitor of cyclo-oxygenase activity in intact cells. However, acetaminophen, unlike nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), cannot inhibit activity in broken cell preparations. The inhibitory effects of acetaminophen were abolished by increasing intracellular oxidation conditions with the cell-permeable hydroperoxide t-butylOOH. Similarly the inhibitory effects of the cyclo-oxygenase-2 selective inhibitor rofecoxib or the mixed cyclo-oxygenase-1/cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors ibuprofen and naproxen were significant reduced by t-butylOOH. By contrast, the inhibitory effects of indomethacin or diclofenac, which also inhibit both cyclo-oxygenase-1 and cyclo-oxygenase-2, were unaffected by t-butylOOH. These observations dispel the notion that cyclo-oxygenase-3 is involved in the actions of acetaminophen and provide evidence that supports the theory that acetaminophen interferes with the oxidation state of cyclo-oxygease. Moreover, they suggest for the first time that the inhibitory effects of some NSAIDs, including the newly introduced cyclo-oxygenase-2 selective inhibitor rofecoxib, owe part of their inhibitory actions to effects on oxidation state of cyclo-oxygenase. Our data with t-butylOOH and NSAIDs illustrates an, as yet, undeveloped therapeutic window for the "cyclo-oxygenase inhibitor". Specifically, combining active site selectively with actions on enzyme oxidation state would allow for a broader range of tissue selective drugs.
Recent data have suggested that regular consumption of nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), particularly selective inhibitors of cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2), is associated with an increased risk of thrombotic events. It has been suggested that this is due to NSAIDs reducing the release from the endothelium of the antithrombotic mediator prostaglandin I2 as a result of inhibition of endothelial COX-2. Here, however, we show that despite normal human vessels and endothelial cells containing cyclo-oxygenase-1 (COX-1) without any detectable COX-2, COX-1 in vessels or endothelial cells is more readily inhibited by NSAIDs and COX-2-selective drugs than COX-1 in platelets (e.g., log IC50+/-SEM values for endothelial cells vs. platelets: naproxen -5.59+/-0.07 vs. -4.81+/-0.04; rofecoxib -4.93+/-0.04 vs. -3.75+/-0.03; n=7). In broken cell preparations, the selectivities of the tested drugs toward endothelial cell over platelet COX-1 were lost. These observations suggest that variations in cellular conditions, such as endogenous peroxide tone and substrate supply, and not the isoform of cyclo-oxygenase present, dictate the effects of NSAIDs on endothelial cells vs. platelets. This may well be because the platelet is not a good representative of COX-1 activity within the body as it produces prostanoids in an explosive burst that does not reflect tonic release from other cells. The results reported here can offer an explanation for the apparent ability of NSAIDs and COX-2-selective inhibitors to increase the risk of myocardial infarction and stroke.
Circulating platelets are constantly exposed to nitric oxide (NO) released from the vascular endothelium. This NO acts to reduce platelet reactivity, and in so doing blunts platelet aggregation and thrombus formation. For successful hemostasis, platelet activation and aggregation must occur at sites of vascular injury despite the constant presence of NO. As platelets aggregate, they release secondary mediators that drive further aggregation. Particularly significant among these secondary mediators is ADP, which, acting through platelet P2Y 12 receptors, strongly amplifies aggregation. Platelet P2Y 12 receptors are the targets of very widely used antithrombotic drugs such as clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor. Here we show that blockade of platelet P2Y 12 receptors dramatically enhances the antiplatelet potency of NO, causing a 1,000-to 100,000-fold increase in inhibitory activity against platelet aggregation and release reactions in response to activation of receptors for either thrombin or collagen. This powerful synergism is explained by blockade of a P2Y 12 receptor-dependent, NO/cGMPinsensitive phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway of platelet activation. These studies demonstrate that activation of the platelet ADP receptor, P2Y 12 , severely blunts the inhibitory effects of NO. The powerful antithrombotic effects of P2Y 12 receptor blockers may, in part, be mediated by profound potentiation of the effects of endogenous NO.anti-platelet therapy | atherothrombosis | prostacyclin A ctivation of platelets in a damaged blood vessel leads to a well-characterized sequence of events, including the important release of secondary mediators of aggregation, notably ADP and thromboxane A 2 (1-3). These mediators are the targets of antithrombotic drugs taken by many millions of patients as prophylactic protection against heart attacks and strokes. In particular, inhibition of thromboxane A 2 production by aspirin explains the antithrombotic utility of this drug, whereas blockade of the ADP receptor, P2Y 12 , by drugs such as clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor provides a second, and possibly even stronger, antithrombotic protection (4). Within the circulation, platelets are constantly exposed to antithrombotic mediators, notably prostaglandin I 2 (PGI 2 ), which is derived from the vascular endothelium, and nitric oxide (NO), which can be produced by the vascular endothelium (5) and platelets themselves (6, 7). This leads to the understanding that there is an important interplay between endothelial-derived antiaggregatory mediators and platelet-derived proaggregatory mediators. For example, it has been demonstrated that activation of platelet P2Y 12 receptors by ADP causes inhibition of platelet adenylyl cyclase, which reduces the ability of PGI 2 acting through prostaglandin IP receptors to elevate cAMP, and thus reduces platelet aggregation. Hence, blockade of platelet P2Y 12 receptors increases the sensitivity of platelets to the antiaggregatory and antisecretory effects of PGI 2 (8, 9). This interaction is re...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.