The aim of this study was to determine the pattern of myocardial infarction (MI) incidence with regard to age, gender, infarction site, and the most important risk factors. All 3,454 patients hospitalized in coronary care units of Clinical Hospital Split between 1989 and 1997 were analyzed. In the 3-year period preceding the war, from 1989 to 1991, 1,024 patients were hospitalized because of MI. During the 3 years of full war activities, from 1992 to 1994, there were 1,257 patients (significantly more; p < 0.05). And in the 3-year period after the war, from 1995 to 1997, there were 1,173 patients. In the war period, there were 151 (12%) patients younger than 45 years of age (p < 0.05); of that number, 143 (95%) were men (significantly more than in the other two periods; p < 0.05) and 8 (5%) were women. In the period preceding the war, there were 66 (6.5%) patients younger than 45 years: 60 (91%) men and 6 (9%) women. In the period after the war, those numbers were 88 (7.5%), 81 (92%), and 7 (8%), respectively. The patients younger than 45 years (305) more often had MI of an inferior than an anterior site (49% vs. 28%; p < 0.001), whereas there was no difference in patients older than 45 years (36% vs. 37%; p > 0.05). The patients older than 45 years had significantly greater hospital mortality (21% vs. 4%; p < 0.001) and were more likely to have hypertension (51% vs. 15%; p < 0.001) as well as hypercholesterolemia (54% vs. 14%; p < 0.001). Smokers prevailed among those younger than 45 years (75% vs. 51%; p < 0.001). The number of hospitalized patients with MI was greatest during the war period. It included a significant increase in the incidence in men younger than 45 years (12% vs. 7%; p < 0.05), with smoking as the most important risk factor, especially for infarctions of inferior sites.
BACKGROUNDThere are conflicting data about gender differences in short-term mortality after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) after adjusting for age and other prognostic factors. Therefore, we investigated the risk profile, clinical presentation, in-hospital mortality and mechanisms of death in women and men after the first AMI.METHODSThe data were obtained from a chart review of 3382 consecutive patients, 1184 (35%) women (69.7±10.9 years) and 2198 (65%) men (63.5±11.8 years) with a first AMI. The effect of gender and its interaction with age, risk factors and thrombolytic therapy on overall mortality and mechanisms of death were examined using logistic regression.RESULTSUnadjusted in-hospital mortality was higher in women (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.47–2.15). Adjustment that included both age only and age and other base-line differences (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, smoking, AMI type, AMI site, mean peak CK value, thrombolytic therapy) decreased the magnitude of the relative risk of women to men but did not eliminate it (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.03–1.54 and OR 1.31 95% CI 1.03–1.66, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that female gender was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality after the first AMI. Women were dying more often because of mechanical complications—refractory pulmonary edema and cardiogenic shock (P=0.02) or electromechanical dissociation (P=0.03), and men were dying mostly by arrhythmic death, primary ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (P=0.002). Female gender was independently associated with mechanical death (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.35–2.58; P=0.01) and anterior AMI was independently associated with arrhythmic death (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.34–0.86; P=0.01).CONCLUSIONOur results demonstrate significant differences in mechanisms of in-hospital death after the first AMI in women and men, suggesting the possibility that higher in-hospital mortality in women exists primarily because of the postponing AMI death due to the gender-related differences in susceptibility to cardiac arrhythmias following acute coronary events.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.