Highlights Close relationship is found between low serum zinc and severe states of COVID-19. Hypozincemia critically contributes to aggravation of COVID-19. Serum zinc level can be predictive factor for critical illness of COVID-19. We would recommend oral medication of zinc salts to patients with COVID-19. Abstract Objectives Because most severely ill patients with COVID-19 in our hospital showed zinc deficiency, we aimed to examine the relationship between the patient’s serum zinc level and severe cases of COVID-19. Methods Serum zinc <70 µg/dL was defined as the criterion for hypozincemia, and patients continuously with serum zinc <70 µg/dL were classified in the hypozincemia cohort. To evaluate whether hypozincemia could be a predictive factor for critical illness of COVID-19, we performed the multivariate analysis by employing logistic regression analysis. Results Prolonged hypozincemia was found to be a risk factor for a severe case of COVID-19. In evaluating the relationship between the serum zinc level and severity of patients with COVID-19 by multivariate logistic regression analysis, critical illness can be predicted through the sensitivity and false specificity of an ROC curve with an error rate of 10.3% and AUC of 94.2% by only two factors: serum zinc value ( P = 0.020) and LDH value ( P = 0.026). Conclusions Proper management of the prediction results in this study can contribute to the establishment and maintenance of a safe medical system, taking the arrival of the second wave and spread of COVID-19 in the future into consideration.

Although macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae strains possessing either the ermB or mefA gene are very common in Japan, clinical and microbial factors in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) caused by different macrolide resistance genotypes have not been evaluated. A multicenter study of CAP caused by S. pneumoniae was performed in Japan from 2003 to 2005. A total of 156 isolates were tested for susceptibility to antibiotics correlated with ermB and mefA genotyping. Independent relationships between tested variables and possession of either the ermB or the mefA gene were identified. Of 156 isolates, 127 (81.4%) were resistant to erythromycin, with the following distribution of resistance genotypes: ermB alone (50.0%), mefA alone (23.7%), and both ermB and mefA (7.1%). All isolates were susceptible to telithromycin. By multivariate analysis, oxygen saturation of <90% on admission increased the risk for ermBpositive pneumococcal pneumonia (odds ratio [OR] ‫؍‬ 11.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] ‫؍‬ 1.30 to 95.0; P ‫؍‬ 0.03), but there were no associations with mefA or with ermB mefA positivity. Penicillin nonsusceptibility was associated with mefA-positive and with ermB-and mefA-positive isolates (OR ‫؍‬ 14.2; 95% CI ‫؍‬ 4.27 to 46.9; P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0001, respectively) but not with ermB-positive isolates. The overall patient mortality was 5.1%. Mortality, the duration of hospitalization, and the resolution of several clinical markers were not associated with the different erythromycin resistance genotypes. In Japan, S. pneumoniae with erythromycin resistance or possession of ermB, mefA, or both genes was highly prevalent in patients with CAP. The risk factors for ermB-positive, mefA-positive, and double ermB-mefA-positive pneumococcal pneumonia were different, but the clinical outcomes did not differ.

Background and objective: Acute exacerbation (AE) in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) or other idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIP) is a poor prognostic event despite conventional therapy with corticosteroids and/or immunosuppressants. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin (rhTM) for AE-IIP. Methods: For this prospective single-arm open-label multicentre cohort study, we retrospectively registered 61 cases of AE-IIP treated with conventional therapy between 2011 and 2013 (control arm), and prospectively enrolled 39 cases of AE-IIP treated with conventional therapy and rhTM (380 U/kg/day for 6 days) between 2014 and 2016 (rhTM arm). To reduce potential confounding in treatment comparisons, an adjusted mortality analysis for 90-day survival was conducted with weighted Cox proportional hazards regression models using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Weights were derived from propensity scores estimated using a multivariable logistic regression analysis including potential confounders. Results: The 90-day survival rates of AE-IIP patients treated with/without rhTM were 66.7% (26/39) and 47.5% (29/61), respectively. After adjusting for imbalances, rhTM therapy was significantly associated with reduced mortality (adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 0.453; 95% CI: 0.237-0.864; P = 0.0163). The frequencies of adverse events with/without rhTM were 17.9% (7/39) and 19.7% (12/61), which were similar in both arms (P = 1.0). Two bleeding-related adverse events occurred in the rhTM arm. Conclusion: Safety and efficacy were observed for rhTM treatment of AE-IIP. A future randomized controlled trial is required to draw final conclusions.Clinical trial registration: UMIN000014969 at www.umin. ac.jp

No abstract

No abstract