Background: Retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF) is a rare disease characterized by the presence of inflammatory and fibrous retroperitoneal tissue that often encircles abdominal organs including aorta and ureters. Data on the incidence of this disease are limited. Summary: The disease may be idiopathic or secondary to infections, malignancies, drugs or radiotherapy. Idiopathic form is an immune-mediated entity and a part of the broader spectrum of idiopathic diseases termed chronic periaortitis, characterized by a morphologically similar fibroinflammatory changes in aorta and surrounding tissues. Taking into account the dominant symptoms and clinical charac-teristics of patients with periaortitis, two subtypes of disease could be distinguished. Vascular subtype include patients with non-dilated aorta or with inflammatory abdominal aortic aneu-rysm, both with and without involvement of adjacent structures and with numerous risk factors for atherosclerosis. In renoureteral subtype obstructive uropathy manifesting with hydronephro-sis and acute kidney injury is predominant finding. Due to the variety of symptoms, diagnosis of RPF remains challenging, difficult and often delayed. A series of diagnostic tests should be performed, in order to confirm the diagnosis idiopathic RPF. Laboratory work-up include eval-uation of inflammatory indices and immunological studies. A biopsy and histopathological evaluation may be necessary to confirm diagnosis and differentiate the disease. Computed to-mography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) are the modalities of choice for the diagnosis and follow-up of this disease. Management of ureteral obstruction, hydronephrosis, and aortic aneurysms often requires surgical evaluation and treatment. The pharmacological treatment of RPF has been evaluated in a few randomized trials and is mainly based on observational studies. Steroid therapy remains the gold standard of treatment. Key messages: Nowadays multidisciplinary team approach with clinical and diagnos-tic experience in both primary and secondary RPF as well as two major subtypes should be offered. Centers specialized in rare diseases with collaboration with other units and referral sys-tem yield the best possible outcomes.

Introduction One of the concepts of theranostics in nuclear medicine is peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), whereby labeled somatostatin analogs are used for imaging and treating inoperable or disseminated neuroendocrine tumors (NET). Aim The aim of the study was to determine the therapeutic efficacy and toxicity of tandem 90 Y / 177 Lu-DOTATATE in patients with disseminated NET in a multicenter trial. Materials and methods 103 patients with NET G1/G2 treated with 90 Y/ 177 Lu-DOTATATE (1:1) with amino-acid infusion for nephroprotection were included in the study. Results Overall survival from the disease diagnosis (OS-D) was 127.4 months and from the time of PRRT (OS-T) was 89.5 months. Progression-free survival (PFS) was 29.9 months. An analysis based on the proliferation index revealed a statistically significant impact on PFS and OS-T (PFS G1 vs G2, 59.3 vs 24.3 months; OS-T G1 vs G2, not reached vs 79.9 months). The effect of the primary disease site was also analyzed. For pancreatic vs small bowel vs large bowel, the PFS was 30.8 vs 30.3 vs 40.6 months, the OS-T was 94 vs 61.9 vs 131.2 months and OS-D was 130.4 vs 89.2 vs not reached months, respectively. The 2-year risk of progression was 42%. The probability of 2-year and 5-year overall survival was 89% and 62%, respectively. PRRT was well tolerated by all patients. One patient (1%) developed myelodysplastic syndrome. No other grade 3 and 4 hematological or renal toxicity was observed. Conclusions This multicenter trial showed that tandem 90 Y/ 177 Lu-DOTATATE is highly effective and safe therapy for patients with disseminated NET.

Atrial fibrillation may affect blood pressure measurements. The ankle-brachial index (ABI) is a ratio of systolic blood pressure measured on the lower and upper limbs that may also be affected by arrhythmia. The purpose of the study was to investigate whether atrial fibrillation influenced ABI results. Ninety-nine patients (age 66.6±11 years, 63 males and 36 females) who underwent electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation were investigated. ABI measurements using the Doppler method were performed on both lower extremities before and after electrical cardioversion. Measurements were repeated three times and then averaged. The ABI using both lower limbs was lower before electrical cardioversion than after restoration to sinus rhythm (right side: 1.132 (1.065-1.210) during atrial fibrillation vs. 1.179 (1.080-1.242) in sinus rhythm, P=0.019; left side: 1.142 (1.075-1.222) during atrial fibrillation vs. 1.170 (1.098-1.255) in sinus rhythm, P=0.011). However, the upper 95% confidence interval (CI) margins for the median differences in ABI were 0.045 and 0.040 for right and left, respectively, suggesting that the observed difference was clinically insignificant. There was a significant correlation between measurements obtained before and after electrical cardioversion on both lower limbs (r=0.61, P<0.001 and r=0.67, P<0.001). The Bland-Altman plot showed good agreement between measurements performed using the Doppler method during atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm. Study results showed that atrial fibrillation did not have a clinically important effect on ABI measurements.

The study presented three cases of patients diagnosed with adrenal tumors subject to surgical intervention during the past 6 months in our Department. The patients presented with radiological diagnostic difficulties, as to the character and location of the primary tumor. the aim of the study was to demonstrate differences between radiological examination results and the factual situation observed during the adrenalectomy. In all the presented cases patients' were subject to laparoscopic intervention. In two cases conversion to open surgery was necessary. The histopathological results of the surgically removed samples were as follows: leiomyoma, myoperycytoma and pheochromocytoma. In selected cases imaging examinations might be of limited value, especially when determining the character and location of the primary lesion of the adrenal gland.

We present a case of a 40–year old woman diagnosed with a four–place spontaneous paraganglioma–pheochromocytoma syndrome, which was treated surgically. The presence of the succinate dehydrogenase complex subunit D (SDHD) mutation that causes the pheochromocytoma was confirmed but no mutations in the family members were found. After the excision of the paragangliomas located in the areas of the division of carotid arteries, and mediastinum, as well as a tumor on the left site of the celiac trunk, the patient remains asymptomatic and is regularly followed–up.