Background and objectives:COVID-19 related inflammation, endothelial dysfunction and coagulopathy may increase the bleeding risk and lower efficacy of revascularization treatments in patients with acute ischemic stroke. We aimed to evaluate the safety and outcomes of revascularization treatments in patients with acute ischemic stroke and COVID-19.Methods:Retrospective multicenter cohort study of consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke receiving intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and/or endovascular treatment (EVT) between March 2020 and June 2021, tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection. With a doubly-robust model combining propensity score weighting and multivariate regression, we studied the association of COVID-19 with intracranial bleeding complications and clinical outcomes. Subgroup analyses were performed according to treatment groups (IVT-only and EVT).Results:Of a total of 15128 included patients from 105 centers, 853 (5.6%) were diagnosed with COVID-19. 5848 (38.7%) patients received IVT-only, and 9280 (61.3%) EVT (with or without IVT). Patients with COVID-19 had a higher rate of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH) (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.53; 95% CI 1.16–2.01), symptomatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SSAH) (OR 1.80; 95% CI 1.20–2.69), SICH and/or SSAH combined (OR 1.56; 95% CI 1.23–1.99), 24-hour (OR 2.47; 95% CI 1.58–3.86) and 3-month mortality (OR 1.88; 95% CI 1.52–2.33).COVID-19 patients also had an unfavorable shift in the distribution of the modified Rankin score at 3 months (OR 1.42; 95% CI 1.26–1.60).Discussion:Patients with acute ischemic stroke and COVID-19 showed higher rates of intracranial bleeding complications and worse clinical outcomes after revascularization treatments than contemporaneous non-COVID-19 treated patients. Current available data does not allow direct conclusions to be drawn on the effectiveness of revascularization treatments in COVID-19 patients, or to establish different treatment recommendations in this subgroup of patients with ischemic stroke. Our findings can be taken into consideration for treatment decisions, patient monitoring and establishing prognosis.

Introduction. Acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) is caused by significant disturbances in the cerebral bloodflow (CBF) that lead to brain ischaemia and eventually result in irreversible brain tissue damage. The main goal of its treatment is to restore bloodflow to the areas at risk of necrosis. Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and mechanical thrombectomy (MT) are the mainstay of current therapy, with the latter being widely employed in selected patients with radiologically proven large vessel occlusion (LVO). Despite convincing evidence of its efficacy, up to half of patients undergoing endovascular treatment (EVT) still do not achieve a beneficial functional outcome; this is mainly due to unfavourable brain tissue sequelae. Therefore, factors associated with known adverse brain changes, such as larger infarct size or haemorrhagic and oedematous complications, should be adequately addressed.Objective. To review the available literature describing AIS brain tissue outcome assessed by computed tomography (CT) and/ or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients undergoing MT treatment. Additionally, to evaluate the association of post-MT tissue changes with short-and long-term prognosis.Material and methods. We searched the PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases according to established criteria.Results. We found a total of 264 articles addressing the most common types of AIS tissue sequelae after EVT (i.e. MT with or without IVT as bridging therapy) by brain CT and MRI. These were: follow-up infarct volume (FIV), cerebral oedema (COD) and haemorrhagic transformation (HT). As the next step, 37 articles evaluating factors associated with defined outcomes were selected. Several non-modifiable factors such as age, comorbidities, pretreatment neurological deficit, and collateral circulation status were found to affect stroke tissue sequelae, to varying degrees. Additionally, some factors including time to treatment initiation, selection of treatment device, and periprocedural systemic blood pressure, the modification of which can potentially reduce the occurrence of an unfavourable tissue outcome, were identified. Some recently revealed biochemical and serological parameters may play a similar role.Conclusions. The identification of factors that affect post-MT ischaemic area evolution may result in studies assessing the effects of their modification, and potentially improve clinical outcomes. Modifiable parameters, including periprocedural systemic blood pressure and some biochemical factors, may be of particular importance.

Zespół hiperperfuzji mózgowej jest rzadkim, ale poważnym powikłaniem, które może wystąpić w następstwie przywrócenia dopływu krwi do mózgu po zabiegach rewaskularyzacyjnych. Dotychczas był on najlepiej poznany u chorych poddawanych zabiegom endarterektomii i stentowania. Po wprowadzeniu do terapii udaru mózgu leczenia swoistego zespół hiperperfuzji zaczęto również obserwować u pacjentów leczonych trombolitycznie lub za pomocą trombektomii mechanicznej. Należy go zawsze rozważyć u pacjentów z pogorszeniem klinicznym po udanej rekanalizacji, gdyż w przypadku niewłaściwego postępowania może prowadzić do poważnych konsekwencji. Dlatego też tak ważne są jego wczesne rozpoznanie i szybkie wdrożenie leczenia.W pracy przedstawiono aktualne doniesienia dotyczące zespołu hiperperfuzji ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem jego występowania po leczeniu udaru niedokrwiennego mózgu.