In this paper the line-spring model (LSM) developed by Rice and Levy is used to obtain an approximate solution of the stress intensity factor for a partial circumferential, externally cracked tube under axial tension and four point bending. The calculation is based on the work done by Delale and Erdogan for cylindrical shells containing a circumferential or an axial semi-elliptical, part-through crack. The range of utility of their analysis is enlarged to thicker wall tubes with nonelliptic and longer part-through circumferential cracks. Values of Kl calculated by the LSM are compared with those from a finite element analysis for remote tensile loading and bending cases, which shows fairly good agreement. The calculations are also applied to a fatigue crack growth test in a tube in four point bending to correlate the da/dN vs AKl data. NOMENCLATURE a, a, = crack depth at the deepest penetration point a(x) =crack depth of surface crack C, = local compliances corresponding to the SEN specimen da/dN = crack growth rate F, , F2 = geometry functions for the SEN specimen KO = stress intensity factor for a corresponding SEN specimen under tension and bending L =half length of surface crack K I , AKl = stress intensity factor M , M" =bending moment per unit length on a plate N, N" = membrane force per unit length on a plate r = plate thickness or pipe wall thickness P,, = compliances of the SEN specimen 6 ( x ) , 6, = axial displacement of the plate at mid-surface O ( x ) , 0, = rotation on plate at mid-surface 5 = dimensionless crack depth 1, = shape factor of the cylinder shell v = Poisson's ratio u = fiber stress of pipes 24 =crack angle for a surface crack in a pipe
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.