The aim of this study was to assess the expression of CD23 on peripheral blood B-cells, and its in vitro modulation by recombinant human interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) in phytohaemagglutinin-(PHA) or recombinant human interleukin-4 (IL-4)-stimulated cultures in atopic patients with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus hypersensitivity and in healthy non-atopic subjects. Atopic patients with asthma not receiving allergen-specific immunotherapy (n = 21) were studied and further compared with a group of atopic subjects with asthma under allergen-specific immunotherapy (n = 21). They were age-(+/- 5 yr) and sex-matched. The results were also compared with those obtained in the non-atopic group (n = 11). CD23 expression on B-lymphocytes and its modulation were analyzed by flow cytometry using conjugated monoclonal antibodies with a double immunofluorescence method. Atopic patients had an increase in the percentage of B-cells expressing CD23 in peripheral blood. Phytohaemagglutinin and IL-4 induced a rise in the percentage of CD23-positive B-cells in both atopic groups and non-atopic subjects. Phytohaemagglutinin provoked an increase in the intensity of CD23 expression on B-cells from stimulated cultures in all groups, while IL-4 only produced a significant increase in atopic patients. The presence of IFN-gamma decreased the CD23 expression on B-cells in PHA-stimulated culture of atopic patients, whereas it caused an increase in CD23 expression in the non-atopic group. Furthermore, the presence of IFN-gamma in IL-4-stimulated cultures induced a decrease in CD23 expression on B-cells in all cases.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
SUMMARYClonal deletion or inactivation of donor-specific alloreactive cells are important mechanisms that are believed to account for acquired immune tolerance in allograft recipients. Serial assessment of precursor cytotoxic T lymphocyte frequencies (CTLpf) by limiting dilution analysis (LDA) provides information at the clonal level on changes in the alloimmune response of graft recipients. We performed a longitudinal study of 15 cadaveric kidney recipients before and every 3 months throughout the first year after transplantation (Tx). Pre-Tx values of donor CTLpf showed high interindividual variability without a predictive value for the clinical outcome. All patients with well functioning kidneys had decreased CTLpf at 3 months post-Tx in comparison with pre-Tx values. This decrease was donorspecific in four patients and was permanent in two cases throughout the study. Most patients presented decreased anti-donor CTLpf values from 6 to 9 months, whereas a partial recovery of donor CTLpf was observed in three patients. Reversible acute rejection was diagnosed in three patients, and it was associated with a marked increase in anti-donor CTLpf, returning to pre-Tx values by 9 months post-Tx. In addition, one patient with chronic rejection displayed a transient increase in CTLpf 6 months after Tx. The results of this sequential study indicate the establishment of a state of either hyporesponsiveness or functional clonal inactivation, transient or permanent, which could facilitate allograft acceptance.
IntroductionSARS-CoV-2 vaccines’ effectiveness is not yet clearly known in immunocompromised patients. This study aims to assess the humoral and cellular specific immune response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and the predictors of poor response in patients with common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) phenotype and in patients treated with B-cell depletion therapies (BCDT), as well as the safety of these vaccines.MethodsFrom March to September 2021, we performed a prospective study of all adult patients who would receive the SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and were previously diagnosed with (i) a CVID syndrome (CVID phenotype group; n=28) or (ii) multiple sclerosis (MS) treated with B-cell depleting therapies three to six months before vaccination (BCD group; n=24). Participants with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection; or prior SARS-CoV-2 vaccine administration; or use of any immunosuppressant (except BCDT in MS group) were excluded. A group of subjects without any medical condition that confers immunosuppression and who met all study criteria was also assessed (control group; n=14). A chemiluminescence immunoassay was used to determine pre- and post-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine anti-S IgG antibodies. T-cell specific response was assessed by analysis of pre- and post-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination blood samples with an interferon-gamma release assay. The baseline blood sample also included several biochemical, haematological and immunological analyses.ResultsSARS-CoV-2 vaccines are safe in immunocompromised patients, although their effectiveness was lower than in healthy individuals. CVID phenotype patients showed impaired humoral (29%) and cellular (29%) response, while BCD patients fundamentally presented humoral failure (54%). Low IgA values, low CD19+ peripheral B cells, low switched memory B cells, and a low CD4+/CD8+ ratio were predictors of inadequate specific antibody response in CVID phenotype patients. No factor was found to predict poor cellular response in CVID phenotype patients, nor a defective humoral or cellular response in BCD patients.ConclusionThe effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in CVID phenotype and BCD patients is lower than in healthy individuals. Knowledge of predictive factors of humoral and cellular response failure in immunocompromised patients could be very useful in clinical practice, and thus, studies in this regard are clearly needed.
Introduction: Severe lung injury is triggered by both the SARS-CoV-2 infection and the subsequent host-immune response in some COVID-19 patients.Methods: We conducted a randomized, single-center, open-label, phase II trial with the aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of methylprednisolone pulses and tacrolimus plus standard of care (SoC) vs. SoC alone, in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19. The primary outcome was time to clinical stability within 56 days after randomization.Results: From April 1 to May 2, 2020, 55 patients were prospectively included for subsequent randomization; 27 were assigned to the experimental group and 28 to the control group. The experimental treatment was not associated with a difference in time to clinical stability (hazard ratio 0.73 [95% CI 0.39–1.37]) nor most secondary outcomes. Median methylprednisolone cumulative doses were significantly lower (360 mg [IQR 360–842] vs. 870 mg [IQR 364–1451]; p = 0.007), and administered for a shorter time (median of 4.00 days [3.00–17.5] vs. 18.5 days [3.00–53.2]; p = 0.011) in the experimental group than in the control group. Although not statistically significant, those receiving the experimental therapy showed a numerically lower all-cause mortality than those receiving SoC, especially at day 10 [2 (7.41%) vs. 5 (17.9%); OR 0.39 (95% CI 0.05–2.1); p = 0.282]. The total number of non-serious adverse events was 42 in each the two groups. Those receiving experimental treatment had a numerically higher rate of non-serious infectious adverse events [16 (38%) vs. 10 (24%)] and serious infectious adverse events [7 (35%) vs. 3 (23%)] than those receiving SoC.Conclusions: The combined use of methylprednisolone pulses plus tacrolimus, in addition to the SoC, did not significantly improve the time to clinical stability or other secondary outcomes compared with the SoC alone in severe COVID-19. Although not statistically significant, patients receiving the experimental therapy had numerically lower all-cause mortality than those receiving SoC, supporting recent non-randomized studies with calcineurin inhibitors. It is noteworthy that the present trial had a limited sample size and several other limitations. Therefore, further RCTs should be done to assess the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus to tackle the inflammatory stages of COVID-19.Clinical Trial Registration: Identifier [NCT04341038/EudraCT: 2020-001445-39].
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.