This study determined the correlated responses in reproductive performance after five generations of divergent selection for components of efficient lean growth rate in Large White pigs.Data were collected from five generations of pigs divergently selected for daily food intake (DFI), lean food conversion (LFC), lean growth rate on ad-libitum feeding (LGA) and lean growth rate on restricted or scale feeding (LGS). In each selection group, there were high, low and control lines, each consisting of 10 boars and 20 gilts. Animals were mated at around 9.5 months of age. Pregnant gilts were fed 2.5 kg daily and farrowed sows up to 3.5 kg twice daily of a 160 g/kg DM crude protein and 132 MJ/kg DM digestible energy ration. Animals were farrowed at 414 (s.d. 19.7) days of age, on average. No cross fostering was practised. Piglets were offered creep feed containing 235 g/kg DM crude protein and 160 MJ/kg DM digestible energy from 14 days and were weaned at an average of 35 (s.d. 3) days. Litter traits were measured on 1220 selected Large White gilts, with 13030 piglet birth weights and 9951 weaning weights.

Lactational performance was measured in Large White gilts from lines that had been divergently selected over seven generations for daily food intake (DFI), lean food conversion ratio (LFC), lean growth rate with ad-libitum (LGA) or restricted (LGS) feeding during performance test. Control line gilts were included in the study. During the lactation period of 21 days, gilts were given to appetite five isoenergetic diets differing in ileal digestible lysine: energy (0·40, 0·58, 0·76, 0·94 and 1·12 g/MJ digestible energy). The study consisted of 223 gilts with a similar number of animals in each selection line.Live-weight loss was greater in the low LFC and LGA lines than in the high lines and food intake was significantly lower in the low LGA line than in the high line. Litter-weight gain of the low LFC and high LGA lines were greater than in the complementary selection lines. Prediction equations for nutrient utilization were used to express the effect of diet and selection line in terms of energy and protein inputs and outputs. Selection on DFI or LGS resulted in gilts that did not mobilize lipid during lactation as sufficient energy for milk and maintenance was provided by dietary intake. In contrast, there was insufficient dietary energy with selection on LFC or on low LGA so lipid mobilization was required to achieve energy balance. The energy required to excrete excess protein and energy from lipid mobilization increased as the dietary lysine energy ratio increased, but there were no other dietary effects on energy and protein utilization. Genotype with nutrition interactions were detected for energy intake and lipid mobilization, which were due to the lines selected for low DFI and LGA. The general absence of genotype with nutrition interactions for lactational performance in gilts selected for components of efficient lean growth and the lack of significant dietary effects on energy utilization indicated that the consequences of changing nutritional inputs will be broadly similar for genotypes within the set of genotypes studied. Selection strategies which result in reduced food intake during lactation should be avoided if lipid mobilization is then required to attain energy balance and there are resultant negative effects on subsequent reproductive performance.

No abstract

Responses to four generations of divergent selection in pigs for lean growth rate (LGS) with restricted feeding were studied. The selection criterion was designed to obtain equal correlated responses in growth rate and carcass lean content, measured in phenotypic s.d. Animals were to be performance tested in individual pens with a mean starting weight of 30 kg for a period of 84 days. Daily food intake was equal to 0-75 gig of the daily food intake for pigs offered food ad-libitum. In the high, low and control lines, there ivere 1250 Large White-Edinburgh (LW) pigs and 875 British Landrace-Wye (LR) pigs. Each selection line consisted of 10 sires and 20 dams, with a generation interval ofl year. After four generations of selection, cumulative selection differentials were 5-9 and 4-8 phenotypic s.d. for LW and LR populations, with similar responses, 1-8 (s.e. 0-17) phenotypic s.d. Mean weight at the end of test, growth rate and backfat depths at the shoulder, mid back and loin were 89 kg, 712 g/day, 26,13 and 13 mm for LW and for LR pigs were 87 kg, 683 g/day, 28,10 and 10 mm. High line pigs were heavier at the end of test (4-3 (s.e.d. 1-4) kg and 4-0 (s.e.d. 1-6) kg) for LW and LR populations, with corresponding responses in growth rate (54 (s.e.d. 16) g/day and 47 (s.e.d. 18) g/day). Responses in the three backfat depths were -4-1 (s.e.d. 1-2) mm, -2-6 (s.e.d. 0-7) mm and -2-9 (s.e.d. 0-7) mm for LW and -2-2 (s.e.d. 0-05) mm, -2-2 (s.e.d. 0-4) mm and -2-4 (s.e.d. 0-5) mm for LR populations. Responses in weight off test and backfat depths were symmetric about the control lines. Heritabilities for LGS were 0-34 and 0-28 (s.e.d. 0-5) for the LW and LR populations, when estimated by residual maximum likelihood. Common environmental effects for LGS were 0-11 (s.e. 0-03) for LW and 0-17 (s.e. 0-04) for LR. Heritabilities for growth rate and average backfat depth were similar for , as were common environmental effects (0-10 s.e. 0-04). Average phenotypic and genetic correlations between growth rate and backfat, for LW and LR populations, and -0-06 (s.e. 0-16), respectively).Responses to selection and genetic parameter estimates demonstrate that there is substantial genetic variation in growth and fat deposition when pigs are performance tested on restricted feeding.

Genetic and phenotypic relationships between performance test and reproduction traits were estimated, after five generations of divergent selection for components of efficient lean growth, in a population of Large Wltite pigs. On ad-libitum feeding, a total of 4334 pigs were performance tested, of which 884 selected gilts had measurements of reproduction traits. On a restricted feeding regime, 1558 pigs were tested, which included 336 selected gilts with reproduction records. For pigs given food ad libitum, genetic correlations between litter weights at birth and weaning with daily food intake (0·48 and 0·42, s.e. 0·16) and with growth rate on test (0·65 and 0·52) were positive, but correlations with backfat depths were not significantly different from zero. For pigs given food at a restricted level, litter birth weight was positively genetically correlated with growth rate (0·50, s.e. 0·18) and negatively correlated with backfat depths (-0·48, s.e. 0·16). Phenotypic and environmental correlations between performance test and reproduction traits were all less than 0·10 in magnitude, for pigs tested on either feeding regime. The variation in backfat depth enabled detection of a non-linear relationship between predicted breeding values for litter weight at birth with predicted breeding values for average backfat depth of farrowing gilts performance tested on ad-libitum feeding, but not for gilts tested on restricted feeding. The positive genetic correlations between growth rate and daily food intake with litter traits suggested that selection strategies which change growth and daily food intake may result in relatively greater genetic changes in piglet growth rate than in litter size.