The first wideband dE/dt recordings have been obtained for the narrow bipolar pulses previously identified by Le Vine (1980) as “sources of the strongest RF radiation from lightning.” These dE/dt waveforms are dramatically different from those of other known lightning processes. A burst of high‐frequency “noise” is superimposed on the slower bipolar pattern one might expect from the relatively smooth E waveforms. For 18 such pulses from an isolated thunderstorm cell at known range, the mean peak E and dE/dt, range‐normalized to 100 km, were 8.0±5.3 V/m and 20±15 V/m/μs, respectively. Spectral analysis indicates that the sources of these pulses radiate much more strongly than first‐return strokes at frequencies from 10 MHz to at least 50 MHz. Absolutely calibrated power and energy spectra are presented which are reliable from 200 KHz to perhaps 20 MHz. At 18 MHz the narrow pulses appear to contain nearly 16 dB more spectral energy than first return‐stroke waveforms from the same range. Supporting evidence shows that they generally occur as isolated pulses in intracloud flashes but are not associated with K changes or other known phenomena. They can occur in either polarity.

No abstract

The “transmission‐line model” of return‐stroke radiation, proposed by Uman and McLain (1970), has been tested on rocket‐triggered lightning. Simultaneous measurements are reported of electric radiation field, current at the channel base, and stroke‐propagation velocity. Agreement between model and measurements is generally good during the first few microseconds, although several anomalies are pointed out. Truncation of the sharp initial peak in many of the field waveforms, motivated by the hypothesis that the return stroke begins a short distance above the ground, leads to an average apparent velocity (derived from the ratio of peak field to peak current) of (1.51±0.17) × 108 m/s for 28 strokes, in excellent agreement with the average, photographically measured two‐dimensional velocity of (1.52±0.17) × 108 m/s for 18 of these same strokes. Although the correlation between apparent and photographic velocities for these 18 strokes is poor, the uncertainty in the photographic velocity determinations could explain most of the scatter. The best formula for estimating peak currents (ip) in subsequent return strokes from remotely measured, truncated peak electric fields (E′p) at range D appears to be ip = −3.9 × 10−2 DE′p − 2.7 × 103, where all variables are in MKS units and the electric field polarity of return strokes lowering negative charge is considered negative.

Instruments that measure the intense electric field strengths in thunderclouds (∼100 kV m−1) are designed to minimize the production of ions by small electrical discharges (coronas) emanating from the instruments themselves. The nearby charge of these ions would unpredictably disturb the natural field of the cloud. In an attempt to assess this disturbance, two different instruments (one carried by a rocket and one carried by a balloon) were launched on two occasions into thunderstorms. In spite of differing trajectories, the soundings were similar, which gives us some confidence in both instruments. In addition, the measurements revealed some interesting features of the two storms. Each storm appeared to have six significant and distinct regions of charge. The balloon soundings also revealed that lightning flashes temporarily increased the electric field strength above the thunderclouds (at altitudes from 9.7 to 14.3 km) by amounts up to 10 kV m−1, after which the fields decayed away in 50 to 125 s. One pair of ascent and descent rocket soundings, separated in time by a maximum of 60 s and horizontally by 1 to 3 km, showed little change in the thunderstorm electric field between ground and 7.5 km altitude.

A study of two long-lived Florida anvils showed that reflectivity >20 dBZ increased in area, thickness and sometimes magnitude at mid-level well downstream of the convective cores. In these same regions electric fields maintained strengths >10 kV m1 for many tens of minutes and became quite uniform over tens of kilometers. Millimetric aggregates persisted at 9 to 10 km for extended times and distahces. Aggregation of ice particles enhanced by strong electric fields might have contributed to reflectivity growth in the early anvil, but is unlikely to explain observations further out in the anvil. The enhanced reflectivity and existence of small, medium and large ice particles far out into the anvil suggest that an updraft was acting, perhaps in weak convective cells formed by instability generated from the evaporation and melting of falling ice particles. We conclude that charge separation must have occurred in these anvils, perhaps at the melting level but also at higher altitudes, in order to maintain fields >10 kV m 1 at 9 to 10 km for extended periods of time over large distances. We speculate that charge separation occurred as a result of ice-ice particle collisions (without supercooled water being present) via either a non-inductive or perhaps even an inductive mechanism, given the observed broad ice particle spectra, the strong pre-existing electric fields and the many tens of minutes available for particle interactions. The observations, particularly in the early anvil, show that the charge structure in these anvils was quite complex.1