Soluble hydrocarbon and dissolved oxygen (DO) in a shallow aquifer beneath a field site were characterized by sampling ground water at 42 monitoring wells. Results from 10 sampling periods over three years showed a significant reduction in total benzene mass with time in ground water. These reduction and leakage rates from sources were determined from material balance and nonlinear least‐squares analyses. The natural attenuation rate was calculated to be 0.95%/day. Spatial relationships between DO and total benzene, toluene, and xylene (BTX) were shown to be strongly correlated by statistical analyses and solute transport modeling. In addition, laboratory microcosm biodegradation experiments were performed to determine possible threshold limits for aromatic hydrocarbon oxidation under varying levels of dissolved oxygen. The results were remarkably consistent with field data on the presence of high or low levels of BTX and DO in several monitoring well‐water samples.

When operated properly, in situ soil venting or vapor extraction can be one of the most cost‐effective remediation processes for soils contaminated with gasoline, solvents, or other relatively, volatile compounds. The components of soil‐venting systems are typically off‐the‐shelf items, and the installation of wells and trenches can be done by reputable environmental firms. However, the design, operation, and monitoring of soil‐venting systems are not trivial. In fact, choosing whether or not venting should be applied at a given site is a difficult decision in itself. If one decides to utilize venting, design criteria involving the number of wells, well spacing, well location, well construction, and vapor treatment systems must be addressed. A series of questions must be addressed to decide if venting is appropriate at a given site and to design cost‐effective in situ soil‐venting systems. This series of steps and questions forms a “decision tree” process. The development of this approach is an attempt to identify the limitations of in situ soil venting, and subjects or behavior that are currently difficult to quantify and for which future study is needed.

The efficiency of any soil venting operation will depend significantly on three factors: vapor flowrate, vapor flow path relative to the contaminant distribution, and composition of the contaminant. Simple mathematical models were developed to be used as screening tools to help determine if soil venting will be a viable remediation option at any given spill site. The models relate the applied vacuum, soil permeability, and spill composition to the vapor flowrates, velocities, mass removal rates, and residual composition changes with time. In this report the screening models and some sample calculations are presented. The results illustrate the advantages and limitations of venting as a remediation tool, under both ideal and nonideal conditions.

No abstract