In order to assess the effect of the no-touch isolation technique, in the treatment of large bowel cancers, on the site of first recurrence and disease-free and overall survival, 236 patients were prospectively and randomly assigned to either the no-touch isolation technique (117 patients) or to a conventional resection technique (119 patients). No patient with distant metastases or unresectable disease entered the study. The two treatment groups were comparable with regard to patient characteristics. Pre- and postoperative complications (including mortality within 30 days) were similar in both groups. After a complete follow-up of 5 years, a tendency for reduction in the number of, and time to, occurrences of liver metastases was seen in the no-touch isolation group (P = 0.14). This effect was most obvious in the sigmoid colon with angio-invasive growth. Overall (P = 0.42) and corrected (P = 0.25) survival did not differ significantly among the treatment groups although in every analysis the survival data of the no-touch isolation group were superior. The data do suggest a limited benefit of the no-touch isolation technique. This observation is important since the morbidity and mortality of surgery were equal in both groups.
A total of 150 patients were treated for parotid tumours over a period of 19 years. In 94 per cent superficial or total parotidectomy was performed. Histological diagnosis of the resected specimen revealed pleomorphic adenoma in 92 patients (61 per cent), Whartin's tumour in 30 (20 per cent), various benign neoplasms in 11 (7 per cent) and malignant tumour in 17 (11 per cent). After a mean follow-up of 7.7 years, no recurrence of a benign tumour was seen. Malignant tumours recurred in five patients. Permanent partial facial paralysis was seen in 4 per cent of patients after surgery for benign lesions. Frey's syndrome was observed in 43 per cent of patients, and was not prevented by resection of the auriculotemporal nerve.
Background and Methods. The records of 118 patients who had hepatic resections for colorectal liver metastases were analyzed retrospectively. Results. The patient group, from 15 institutions in The Netherlands, was found to have a 5‐year actuarial survival rate of 21% and a 5‐year actuarial disease‐free survival rate of 19%. The postoperative mortality rate was 7.6%. In the remaining group, the morbidity rate was 34.7%. A number of factors were examined that were reported to be of prospective significance in other studies. In the multivariate proportional hazard model of Cox, the number of metastases (P = 0.001) and the amount of perioperative blood loss (P = 0.002) were related significantly to disease‐free survival. A factor that may be considered a contraindication to resection is the presence of extrahepatic disease (whether nodal or visceral), even if resectable. Conclusions. Although the actual benefit of resection is limited, and it is associated with considerable morbidity, surgical therapy offers some patients a chance for cure. It is a valid expectation that improvement in techniques and a proper understanding of hepatic anatomy will improve the safety and efficacy of hepatic resections in the future. Future research should focus on defining better selection criteria and on study of the value of adjuvant treatment modalities.
Clinical and laboratory results are presented of 229 patients treated by highly selective vagotomy for duodenal ulcer in a non-university teaching hospital. Sixty-two per cent of the operations were performed by residents as part of their training. After 1-8 years follow-up (97 per cent complete) there were 22 recurrences (9.6 per cent). The residents had fewer recurrences than the consultants, but their patients follow-up was shorter. The usual Visick grading is presented (1, 2: 83.5 per cent; 3, 4: 16.5 per cent) as well as an additional way of grading described by Visick in 1948 which suggests that 4 per cent appear to be permanent failures. Mortality rate was 0.4 per cent, complications rate was low and side effects were in general of minor importance. Laboratory results are presented showing that the basal acid output (BAO) was reduced permanently by 65 per cent, and the PAO by 50 per cent. In patients with recurrences BAO was not reduced and the PAO was less reduced than in the non-recurrence group. Metabolic parameters did not deteriorate. Basal serum gastrin rose after operation while serum vitamin B12 remained constant with a minimal tendency to decrease.
Several ways of analyzing recurrence figures are presented in order to demonstrate the difficult interpretation of recurrence rate with highly selective vagotomy (HSV) in 262 patients operated on for duodenal ulcer with an almost complete follow-up. Actuarial recurrence risks and cumulative recurrence hazards are calculated and compared with several studies on the same subject.We conclude that: (a) There is no such entity as a fixed or definitive recurrence percentage (usually indicated in clinical reports as "recurrence rate") after HSV or other operations for duodenal ulcer; (b) The risk of any patient developing a recurrence at any time after HSV is constant in the immediate future and is as high 6 years after operation as it is after 1 year; and (c) There is no permanent cure after HSV; cure can only be expressed as a certain probability of freedom from recurrence in a similar way to that of oncological or vascular surgery.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.