Hypoplasia of epidermal sensory nerves independently of clinical parameters is a new finding in PN and suggests involvement of epidermal nerves in PN pathophysiology. To date, it cannot be ruled out that reduced IENF density is due to repeated scratching. However, the presence of hypoplasia in nonlesional PN skin suggests the presence of a subclinical small fibre neuropathy.

Background Aprepitant is a neurokinin 1 receptor (NK1R) antagonist used for its antipruritic properties in dermatoses and systemic diseases. The mode of action is still unclear. A peripheral effect is assumed as aprepitant shows efficacy in inflammatory skin diseases including prurigo nodularis (PN).Objectives To investigate the peripheral effects of NK1R antagonism in PN and cell culture models.Methods Subjects with PN received an aprepitant treatment. Clinical, morphological and immunohistochemical changes were investigated in skin biopsies before and after treatment. Expression of NK1R was analysed by immunohistochemistry and for downstream pathways ((p)ERK1/2) by Western blotting in PN patients and matched healthy volunteers. Effects of NK1R blocking were analysed in cell cultures of primary keratinocytes by Western blotting for (p)ERK1/2 and by qPCR for NK1R, interleukin (IL)-1beta, IL-6, IL-8 and TNFalpha.Results Aprepitant treatment showed significant reduction in pruritus intensity (P < 0.05) in PN and relevant immunohistochemical changes (down: CD5, CD25, up: CD79a, IL4). NK1R expression was higher in keratinocytes of PN patients compared to healthy controls. After treatment, epidermal NK1R expression increased while expression and activation of ERK1/2 decreased. In vitro, receptor up-regulation and reduced expression and activation of ERK1/2 were confirmed and reduced IL-expression shown when blocking NK1R.Conclusion Our data confirm that NK1R antagonists such as aprepitant exhibit effects in the skin. Epidermal receptor expression, epidermal inflammatory ILs, ERK1/2 MAPK signalling and cutaneous inflammatory infiltrate were targets of NK1R antagonism. This may explain partly the antipruritic effect of NK1R antagonists next to its role in the central nervous system. Rolf Dierichs foundation, DFG -Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; grant numbers: STA1159/4-1; AG271/1-1. expressed in various cell types in the skin including keratinocytes, mast cells and fibroblasts. 7 Sensory neurons release SP directly into peripheral tissues, 8,9 where it has an efferent roleThe paper presents partial results of the doctor thesis of FR and JD. JEADV Results Effects of blocking of NK1R in vivoPruritus intensity and scratch symptoms Prurigo nodularis lesions improved slightly after aprepitant treatment (Fig. 1).

Background Aprepitant is a neurokinin 1 receptor (NK1R) antagonist used for its antipruritic properties in dermatoses and systemic diseases. The mode of action is still unclear. A peripheral effect is assumed as aprepitant shows efficacy in inflammatory skin diseases including prurigo nodularis (PN). Objectives To investigate the peripheral effects of NK1R antagonism in PN and cell culture models. Methods Subjects with PN received an aprepitant treatment. Clinical, morphological and immunohistochemical changes were investigated in skin biopsies before and after treatment. Expression of NK1R was analysed by immunohistochemistry and for downstream pathways ((p)ERK1/2) by Western blotting in PN patients and matched healthy volunteers. Effects of NK1R blocking were analysed in cell cultures of primary keratinocytes by Western blotting for (p)ERK1/2 and by qPCR for NK1R, interleukin (IL)‐1beta, IL‐6, IL‐8 and TNFalpha. Results Aprepitant treatment showed significant reduction in pruritus intensity (P < 0.05) in PN and relevant immunohistochemical changes (down: CD5, CD25, up: CD79a, IL4). NK1R expression was higher in keratinocytes of PN patients compared to healthy controls. After treatment, epidermal NK1R expression increased while expression and activation of ERK1/2 decreased. In vitro, receptor up‐regulation and reduced expression and activation of ERK1/2 were confirmed and reduced IL‐expression shown when blocking NK1R. Conclusion Our data confirm that NK1R antagonists such as aprepitant exhibit effects in the skin. Epidermal receptor expression, epidermal inflammatory ILs, ERK1/2 MAPK signalling and cutaneous inflammatory infiltrate were targets of NK1R antagonism. This may explain partly the antipruritic effect of NK1R antagonists next to its role in the central nervous system.