No abstract

We describe herein functional attributes and generation of immunologic suppressor activity elaborated in response to oncogenic virus infection. Malignant rabbit fibroma virus-induced immunologic suppressor factor (VISF) is a T cell product produced in peak quantities by spleen cells taken from infected rabbits 7 days after infection in vivo. Its production does not appear to require macrophage participation. VISF is highly labile, 3.5 to 12 kDa, and capable of suppressing both B and T lymphocytic responses. Indomethacin and the cyclic nucleotides cAMP and cGMP inhibit its generation. VISF activity is neither antigen nor species specific. It suppresses murine and leporine immune responses to antigens unrelated to the inducing virus. Comparable suppressor activity may be induced by infecting an apparently non-functional rabbit T lymphoma line, RL-5, with malignant rabbit fibroma virus. VISF is principally a suppressor-inducer factor: in vitro, lymphocytes exposed to VISF do not show decreased immunologic responsiveness until 4 days of culture. VISF induces T suppressor cell activity when normal spleen cells are exposed briefly to VISF. Thus, immunosuppressive consequences of malignant fibroma virus infection are partially mediated by a small, non-specific T cell-derived suppressor lymphokine with unique functional characteristics. Non-specific immunologic dysfunction that often attends virus infections may reflect the activity of such factors in humans as well.

Rabbits given malignant rabbit fibroma virus (MV) develop severe immunologic dysfunction during the course of infection. Splenic T lymphocytes from these rabbits elaborate a soluble non-specific immunosuppressive factor (virus-induced suppressor factor (VISF]. As malignant rabbit fibroma virus infection progresses, normal immunologic responsiveness returns. This recovery is multi-factorial and involves production by T lymphocytes of a soluble factor capable of antagonizing the activity of VISF. This soluble anti-suppressor factor (ASF) is not a generalized immunologic potentiator. Its sole apparent effect on immune function appears to be to antagonize the activity of VISF. The protective effects of ASF are evident only when suppressor factors and ASF are simultaneously present in culture. Pre-treatment of target cells with ASF-containing culture supernatants does not render them insensitive to the immunosuppressive effects of subsequent treatment with VISF. In addition, ASF appears to be directly responsible for antagonizing VISF activity. That is, ASF does not appear to initiate an anti-suppressive cascade by activating a population of cells that in turn generate secondary protective factors. ASF-producing cells do not bind Vicia villosa lectin, as do contra-suppressor cells described by others. In almost all of these features, the system we describe herein differs from systems in which other investigators have described factors that antagonize the effects of suppressor factors.