DUBEC, J., KŘEN, J., PROCHÁZKOVÁ, B., DRYŠLOVÁ, T., DOVRTĚL, J.: Comparison of humus balance methods in relation with yields of monoculture spring barley. Acta univ. agric. et silvic. Mendel. Brun., 2004, LII, No. 5, pp. 29-40 Long term stationary field experiments with continuous spring barley were conducted in the maizegrowing region on heavy gleic fluvisol from 1974 to 2002. Two variants of straw management (straw harvested and incorporated into soil), two variants of soil tillage (conventional plough tillage to 0.22 m, shallow disc tillage to 0.12-0.15 m) and three variants of fertilization (30, 60 and 90 kg. N ha -1 ) were studied. The results of organic matter balance in the examinated period according to particular methods were related to trends of real humus content which is presented in C ox in particular experiment variants. The examinated method by LEITHOLD et al. (1997), used in model Repro, answers most accurate in given conditions according to hypothesys defined in scientific literature. On the base of this result we can confirm significancy of the result. Other verification of method is appropriate for its using in real conditions in context of agricultural sustainability assesment. Změny ekonomických podmínek jsou úzce spjaty se změnami struktury rostlinné a živočišné produkce. Počet zemědělských podniků bez živočišné produkce nebo podniků s živočišnou produkcí, ale bez potřeby slámy v České republice vzrůstá. Rovněž dochází ke zúžení spektra pěstovaných kulturních plodin a k vý-znamnému nárůstu podílu obilnin. Nedostatek statkových hnojiv a nezbytnost udržení půdní úrodnosti dodávkou organických látek vede k potřebě hnojení slámou.Problematikou vlivu hospodaření se slámou a zpracování půdy na výnosy jarního ječmene a aspekty půdní úrodnosti se zabývala celá řada autorů (ELEN,
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.