ObjectiveTo study the effect of Nissen fundoplication on the pattern of gastric emptying and intragastric distribution of symptoms in patients with normal and delayed gastric emptying before surgery, especially in those with delayed emptying before surgery. Summary Background DataGastroesophageal reflux disease is associated with delayed gastric emptying and dyspeptic symptoms in approximately 40% of the patients. After Nissen fundoplication, dyspeptic symptoms are also not uncommon. MethodsThirty-six patients (26 men, 10 women, mean age 43.1) were studied before and 3 months after Nissen fundoplication. Gastric emptying (dual-isotope, expressed in lag phase, emptying rate, T 50 , and intragastric distribution) was not included in the decision for surgery. Reflux-related and dyspeptic symptoms were scored before and at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. ResultsTwenty-six patients had normal and 10 had delayed gastric emptying before surgery. Nissen fundoplication on average enhanced gastric emptying for solids in both subgroups by a combination of a decrease in mean lag phase, emptying rate, and T 50 . The preoperative difference in intragastric distribution between patients with and without delayed gastric emptying was abolished by fundoplication. Patients with normal gastric emptying before surgery showed an increase in early postprandial satiety; in those with delayed emptying, this was not observed. A correlation was found between preoperative T 50 for liquid gastric emptying and postoperative nausea at 3 months in patients with normal gastric emptying. In patients with delayed emptying, preoperative correlations between lag phase for liquids and nausea respectively early satiety were significant, as well as for T 50 for liquids and vomiting. ConclusionsNissen fundoplication equalizes the preoperative difference in intragastric distribution and accelerates gastric emptying without an effect on symptoms in patients with preexisting delayed gastric emptying, but with an increase in early satiety in patients with normal gastric emptying. Delayed gastric emptying is not a contraindication for antireflux surgery.Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is associated with delayed gastric emptying for solids and liquids in approximately 40% of the patients. [1][2][3][4][5] Whereas several studies showed that enhancement of delayed gastric emptying by prokinetic drugs improves symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux, 6 -9 others found no correlation between reflux and delayed emptying.3,10 -12 Delayed gastric emptying probably plays a causative role in GERD, and delayed gastric emptying has even been considered a contraindication for antireflux surgery. It has been shown that antireflux surgery accelerates gastric emptying, but this does not imply that gastric function has been improved and will have a positive effect on upper gastrointestinal symptoms. 13,14 In the studies presented, patients have not been subdivided in those with and those without delayed emptying before surgery, and such a subdivision has not been rela...
The aim of this study was to compare the effect of graded gastric barostat distension and meal-induced fundic relaxation on the elicitation of transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation (TLOSR). In 15 healthy subjects, stepwise fundic distension and oesophageal manometry were performed simultaneously. Next, the effect of meal ingestion on proximal stomach volume and lower oesophageal sphincter function was studied. During stepwise barostat distension of the proximal stomach, a significant linear correlation between intragastric pressure (r = 0.91; P < 0.01) and the TLOSR rate during inflation and subsequent deflation (r = 0.96; P < 0.01) was found. A similar relationship was found for volume. In addition, after meal ingestion, the TLOSR rate increased significantly from 1.40 +/- 3 to 5.4 +/- 1.5 h-1 (P < 0.01) and 5.2 +/- 1.7 h-1 (P < 0.01), respectively, during the first and second 30-min postprandially. However, at similar calculated intragastric volumes, barostat distension led to a significantly higher TLOSR rate than the meal. Similarly, distension-induced increase in gastric wall tension, estimated from the measured bag pressure and volume using Laplace's law, was associated with significantly higher TLOSR rates (P < 0.01). In conclusion, the rate of TLOSRs in healthy volunteers is directly related to the degree of proximal gastric distension and pressure-controlled barostat distension is a more potent trigger of TLOSRs than a meal. The latter finding suggests that tension receptor activation is an important stimulus for TLOSRs.
Background: Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) has essentially replaced its conventional open counterpart (CNF). An economic evaluation of LNF compared with CNF based on prospective data with adequate follow-up is lacking.Methods: Data from two consecutive studies (a randomized clinical trial (RCT) of 57 patients undergoing LNF and 46 undergoing CNF that was terminated prematurely, and a follow-up study of 121 consecutive patients with LNF) were combined to determine incremental cost-effectiveness 1 year after surgery.Results: Mean operating time, reoperation rate and hospital costs of LNF were lower in the second series. The mean overall hospital cost per patient was ¤9126 for LNF and ¤6989 for CNF at 1 year in the initial RCT, and ¤7782 in the second LNF series. The success rate of both LNF and CNF at 1 year was 91 per cent in the RCT, and LNF was successful in 90·1 per cent in the second series. A cost reduction of ¤998 for LNF would cancel out the cost advantage of CNF. Similarly, if the reoperation rate after LNF decreased from 0·05 to below 0·008 and/or if the mean duration of sick leave after LNF was reduced from 67·2 to less than 61·1 days, the procedure would become less expensive than CNF. Complications, reoperation rate and quality of life after both operations were similar. Conclusion:Including reinterventions, the outcome at 1 year after LNF and CNF was similar. In a well organized setting with appropriate expertise, the cost advantage of CNF may be neutralized.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.