About 20% of Tasmania's wet eucalypt forest is mixed forest, i.e. having a rainforest understorey and a eucalypt overstorey. While one-third of the mixed forest is formally reserved, much of the remainder is subject to logging on an 80-100 year rotation which is insufficient for the redevelopment of mature mixed forest. The routine silvicultural regeneration treatment for wet eucalypt forests is to clearfell, burn and sow with eucalypt seed. A comparison of the Vascular floristics of 20-30-year-old silvicultural and wildfire regeneration with oldgrowth mixed forest showed that most species common in oldgrowth mixed forest were represented in approximately similar frequencies in silvicultural regeneration and wildfire regeneration. The major floristic difference between the two regeneration types was the much lower frequency of oldgrowth epiphytic fern species in silvicultural regeneration and a higher frequency of a sedge species often associated with disturbed areas. However, after a single logging treatment, the vascular plant floristics of silvicultural regeneration were sufficiently similar to wildfire regeneration to assume that, in the absence of further logging or fires, the silvicultural regeneration could become mature mixed forest and eventually rainforest. Further work is required to determine whether regrowth mixed forest can be logged at 80-100 years and still retain sufficient rainforest elements to eventually return to mixed forest within the life span of the dominant eucalypts. The critical factor in the silvicultural perpetuation of mixed forest may be rotation length rather than regeneration treatment.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

To assess the ecological consequences of selective logging in the major rainforest areas in Australia, past studies are reviewed with respect to the following: recovery of stand structure; regeneration capacity; individual tree growth and species composition of stands; hydrologie impact; floristics; wildlife; soil nutrient levels; fire susceptibility; and incursion of weeds and diseases. Although rainforest logging has become a sensitive issue in the community and its effects are of concern to ecologists, relatively few scientific studies of selective logging have been published. Thus, the full nature and extent of ecological changes to Australian rainforests due to this form of disturbance cannot yet be determined. However, some cautious interpretation of the studies that have been completed is possible. Following a single selective logging, the changes indicated by individual studies often appeared to be relatively minor. It is suggested that many of these effects are not extensive or irreversible and might not persist beyond structural recovery of the rainforest. However, two changes were identified as likely to persist beyond structural recovery. These are: a post‐logging difference in the proportional representation of major overstorey tree species and a reduction in the numbers of large‐diameter trees. Further, results indicate that more extensive and longer‐lasting changes may result from multiple selective loggings, especially if the time between successive loggings is short. Even with light logging intensities, a conservative interval of at least 60 years between selective loggings, to allow canopy and below‐canopy conditions to be restored, is indicated. Apart from disturbance frequency, the studies reviewed raise questions as to whether long‐term natural disturbance effects per se are distinguishable from long‐term selective logging effects. A need for further work is highlighted. Overall, there appears to be a distinction between the recovery capability of the more northerly mainland rainforests and those of Tasmania. Slower growth in the more southerly rainforests, compounded by a geographical susceptibility to summer drought, increases the possibility of fire damage following selective logging.