Core Ideas Forage yields from pea, especially winter pea, were competitive with hay barley yields.Crude protein yield from pea forage was 40 to 110% greater than barley.Crop harvest at the bloom stage used the least soil water and nitrogen.Wheat yield following pea averaged 82 to 88% of that on chemical fallow. There is a growing interest in the use of annual forages in rotation with wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). The objectives of this study were to: (i) compare forage yield and quality of spring and winter pea (Pisum sativum L.), barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), and a pea–barley mixture harvested at flowering (early), pod (late), or grown to maturity; and (ii) compare the cropping‐sequence effects of these cropping treatments for three N fertilizer rates, subsequent wheat yield, and grain quality relative to chemical fallow. This study was conducted at Amsterdam, MT, from 2003 to 2006. Pea forage yield at the pod stage was 1.2 Mg ha−1 (30%) and 3.7 Mg ha−1 (60%) greater than at the flower stage for spring and winter pea, respectively. At the same harvest times, spring barley forage averaged 1.8 Mg ha−1 (32%) greater either as a sole species or when mixed with spring pea. Forage quality of pea forage was high regardless of harvest timing. Protein yield for spring and winter pea forage averaged 0.28 (60%) and 0.38 Mg ha−1 (81%) greater than the barley forage treatments across harvest times and years. Significant differences in stored soil water (19 mm) and soil nitrate N (10 kg N ha−1) were found between flowering and pod forage harvest timing in pea, but these differences only nominally affected subsequent wheat yield or quality. Wheat following pea averaged approximately 85% of the yield on chemical fallow. Among the cropping treatments, the greatest wheat yield and protein occurred following winter pea harvested at the flower stage.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.