AT-101 can be safely combined with topotecan at a reduced dose of 1.25 mg/m(2). The response rates observed did not meet the criteria for additional enrollment; however, many patients had a best response of SD and the median time to progression in both cohorts was favorable. Additional trials of AT-101 in SCLC are ongoing.

537 Background: Treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) includes preoperative radiation concurrent with fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy (CRT). Local recurrence is a problem. Cetuximab is active in colorectal cancer and is effective with radiotherapy in other diseases. This study evaluated the pathologic response rate for LARC treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy w/wo cetuximab. Methods: LARC (T3/4 or LN+, M0) pts were randomized to Arm1/Arm2. Arm 1 received standard pelvic radiotherapy (5040-5400cGy in daily fractions) with continuous infusional 5-FU (225mg/m2/day); Arm 2 received identical chemoradiotherapy + concurrent cetuximab (400mg/m2 initial dose) 1 week before pelvic radiotherapy, followed by 250mg/m2 weekly for the duration of chemoradiotherapy. After study treatment completion, pts were re-evaluated clinically and radiographically for clinical response. After 6-8 weeks, patients underwent surgical resection. The primary end point was pathologic CR (pCR), and secondary endpoints included ORR, RFS, OS, and local recurrence rates. Results: 139 pts were enrolled (Arm 1=69/Arm2=70); Arm1/Arm2 median age 61/55 yrs, and stage II and III 59%, 39%/40%, 60%. In 124 postsurgery pts, pCR occurred in 17 Arm 1 pts (28.3%, 95% CI 17.5-41.4) and 17 Arm 2 pts (26.6%, 95% CI 16.3-39.1); TRG postsurgery was similar between treatment arms (Table). Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were largely nonhematologic: diarrhea 16%/22%, rash 0%/12%, dehydration 5%/8%, mucositis 5%/6%. The 5-yr RFS for Arm1/Arm2 was 61%/65%, 5-yr OS was 66%/83%, local recurrence was 3%/4%. Conclusions: The addition of cetuximab to preoperative CRT for LARC was associated with increased but manageable toxicities. pCR rates were similar between treatment arms, as were survival statistics and local recurrence rates. No association was found between KRAS status and pCR. Clinical trial information: NCT00527111. [Table: see text]

No abstract

8106 Background: Bcl-2 family proteins are expressed in SCLC and are associated with chemotherapy resistance. AT-101 is an oral, pan Bcl-2 family protein inhibitor (Bcl-2, Bcl-XL, Mcl-1, and Bcl-w) and potent inducer of proapoptotic proteins. AT-101 has demonstrated activity in SCLC models, including those that express Mcl-1 and are resistant to other Bcl-2 inhibitors. The P1 portion of the study was previously reported. Methods: Pts ≥18 years of age, PS 0–1, with relapsed or refractory SCLC after first line chemotherapy with measurable disease per RECIST were eligible. Pts were stratified into 2 cohorts; cohort A ≥ 60 days and cohort B < 60 days relapse from prior chemotherapy and treated with T 1.25 mg/m2 daily and AT-101 40 mgs daily on days 1–5, q21 along with the use of myeloid growth factors. Adverse Events (AEs) were graded by the NCI CTCAE v. 3.0. Efficacy assessments (RECIST) were performed every 6-weeks. A 2-stage design was used with power/alpha of 80%/0.05 to detect a RR of > 25% and > 5%, in cohort A and B respectively. Results: 36 pts enrolled: ages 41–76; cohort A/B 23/13. The PR/SD/PD/NE rates were 17%/70%/9%/4% and 8%/54%/23%/15%, in cohorts A/B respectively. The median times to progression (TTP) were 18 and 13 weeks, respectively. The most common (>20 %) AEs (all grades): anemia (64%); neutropenia (53%); nausea (47%); fatigue (44%); thrombocytopenia (42%); dyspnoea (25%); and vomiting (22%). Most common Grade 3/4 related events (>5%): neutropenia (31%); thrombocytopenia (25%); anemia (14%); and asthenia (6%). No ileus was reported. Conclusions: AT-101 can be safely combined with T. The observed toxicities were consistent with the known rates of G4 cytopenias of T alone. The response rates observed did not meet the criteria for additional enrolment; however, many patients had a best response of SD and the median TTP in both cohorts was favorable compared to historical controls. Additional trials of AT-101 in SCLC are ongoing. [Table: see text]

NEURO-ONCOLOGY • NOVEMBER 2017 racy, precision, recall, and F1 measure were calculated for the NLP method. RESULTS: The manual review was completed in 27 days; mean discordance rate was 36.2%. The overall accuracy of the best logistic regression classifier was 84.6% on the training data and 82.8% on the hold-out test data. The precision and recall were both 83%, and the F1-score was 0.83. The algorithm required 28.9 minutes for training, after which it is able to classify the entire dataset in a less than 0.2 second. The model was incorporated into a user-friendly interface that allows for future report classification. CONCLUSION: NLP is a powerful method for the high-throughput evaluation of free-text radiology reports that can have high sensitivity and specificity. Use of NLP can accelerate retrospective clinical research with improved accuracy over manual chart review.