We present geomorphic, stratigraphic, and chronological data acquired along the General Carrera-Buenos Aires (GCBA) glacial lake located along a major morphological incision across the Andes. Complementing relevant available data, relative chronology of morphoclimatic records together with 18 10 Be Cosmic Ray Exposure (CRE) ages allow constraining the timing of the Patagonian ice-sheet fluctuations since the LGM. It improves the knowledge of the Patagonia climate evolution in the 46-48°S area, and allows documenting the uplift rates (glacial rebound) for the past ~7-9 ka. The first major ice lobe retreat occurred after 17.3 ± 0.6 ka and has likely continued during the ACR from ~12.9 to 14.5 ka. Between ~12.9 ka and ~10.9 ± 1.3 ka, the General Carrera Lake evolved as an endorheic basin. Terraces T4 to T1 (top to bottom) have recorded abrupt lake regressions likely controlled by rainfall deficit. They have accumulated in the time interval ~17.3-12.3 ka (maximum limits). Two glacial readvances at ~10.9 ± 1.3 and ~7.9 ± 1.1 ka marked a major climate change that led the lake to be ice-dammed again. A major transgression occurred subsequently that have flooded the previously accumulated terraces. Since then, a pervasive regression has steered the GCBA Manuscript Click here to download Manuscript: DOC 3 NEW TEXT SEPT 2015.doc 2 Lake to the situation at Present. The highest shoreline of the transgression is used as a passive marker in order to quantify the magnitude and character of the regional deformation. At 72°30' W, the GCBA Lake area uplifted (glacial rebound) at a rate between 15 to 33.5 mm.yr-1 during the past ~7.9 ± 1.1 ka. We infer that the high uplift rate mainly originates from the North Patagonian icefield ice loss.
International audienceThis paper aggregates the main basic data acquired along the Chile Triple Junction (CTJ) area (45°–48°S), where an active spreading center is presently subducting beneath the Andean continental margin. Updated sea-floor kinematics associated with a comprehensive review of geologic, geochemical, and geophysical data provide new constraints on the geodynamics of this puzzling area. We discuss: (1) the emplacement mode for the Pleistocene Taitao Ridge and the Pliocene Taitao Peninsula ophiolite bodies. (2) The occurrence of these ophiolitic complexes in association with five adakite-like plutonic and volcanic centers of similar ages at the same restricted locations. (3) The inferences from the cooccurrence of these sub-coeval rocks originating from the same subducting oceanic lithosphere evolving through drastically different temperature–pressure (P–T) path: low-grade greenschist facies overprint and amphibolite-eclogite transition, respectively. (4) The evidences that document ridge-jump events and associated microplate individualization during subduction of the SCR1 and SCR-1 segments: the Chonos and Cabo Elena microplates, respectively. The ridge-jump process associated with the occurrence of several closely spaced transform faults entering subduction is controlling slab fragmentation, ophiolite emplacement, and adakite-like production and location in the CTJ area. Kinematic inconsistencies in the development of the Patagonia slab window document an 11- km westward jump for the SCR-1 spreading segment at*6.5-to-6.8 Ma. The SCR-1 spreading center is relocated beneath the North Patagonia Icefield (NPI). We argue that the deep-seated difference in the dynamically sustained origin of the high reliefs of the North and South Patagonia Icefield (NPI and SPI) is asthenospheric convection and slab melting, respectively. The Chile Triple Junction area provides the basic constraints to define the basic signatures for spreading-ridge subduction beneath an Andean-type margi
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.