No abstract

A number of studies have investigated the influence of surface roughness on the wear of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) in total joint replacement. The results of these studies have shown that the wear factor is proportional to the counterface roughness raised to a power greater than one. In this laboratory study, the effect of surface finish of several biomaterials on the wear of UHMWPE was studied. The study was conducted using reciprocating pin-on-plate wear tests with bovine serum as a lubricant. The biomaterials investigated as the counterface material included stainless steel, cast cobalt chrome (CoCr), CoCr (ASTM F799), alumina ceramic and zirconia ceramic. The counterface topographies of the wear plates were produced using techniques representative of current manufacturing methods. The surface roughness of the wear plates was varied in the range Ra = 0.005-0.04 micron; this was representative of femoral heads and femoral knee components currently used clinically. Metals and ceramics with a similar surface roughness produced a similar wear rate of UHMWPE. For the limited range of smooth counterfaces used in this study only a moderate correlation was found between the surface roughness and the wear factors. For a change in counterface roughness Ra of 0.005 to 0.04 micron, the wear factor increased from 7.4 +/- 1.6 to 16.5 +/- 2.4 x 10(-9) mm3/N m (mean +/- standard error). This variation in counterface roughness had much less effect in wear than previously reported for rougher counterfaces. For an extended range of counterface roughness, a stronger correlation was found using an exponential function for the regression fit. The exponential function shows the benefits of decreased wear with decreased surface roughness. Although the wear rate decreased less rapidly with decreased counterface roughness for Ra values below 0.05 micron, there were significant advantages to be gained from improved femoral head roughness to below 0.01 micron Ra.

While total hip replacement represents the major success story in orthopaedic surgery in the twentieth century, there is much interest in extending even further, early in the twenty first century, the life of implants. Osteolysis has been identified as a major factor limiting the life of prostheses, with indications that fine polyethylene wear debris, generated primarily at the interface between the femoral head and the acetabular cup, promotes the process. There is therefore considerable interest in the introduction of alternative wear resistant systems to limit the deleterious effects of wear. These alternatives include ceramic-on-ceramic and metal-on-metal configurations and the present paper is primarily concerned with the latter. Some six pairs of new metal-on-metal implants of 36 mm diameter and four pairs of existing metal-on-metal implants of 28 mm diameter were tested in a ten-station hip joint simulator in the presence of a 25 per cent bovine serum solution. The implants were tested in the anatomical position to 5 x 10(6) cycles. The new heads and cups were manufactured from CoCrMo alloy with careful attention being paid to sphericity and surface finish of both components. The wear performance of the new and existing metal-on-metal total hip replacements have been evaluated and compared. The overall wear rates have then been compared with previously reported wear rates for a zirconia-on-polyethylene prosthesis of 22 mm diameter tested on the same simulator. The comparison is taken further by recalling published penetration data for metal-on-polyethylene implants of 22 and 28 mm diameter and converting these to volumetric wear rates. It was found that the heads and cups in metal-on-metal joints wore by almost equal amounts and that the opposing surfaces converged to similar surface roughness as the testing time increased. Steady state wear rates were generally achieved after 1-2 x 10(6) cycles. The mean long-term wear rates for the metal-on-metal prostheses were very low, being 0.36 mm3/10(6) cycles and 0.45 mm3/10(6) cycles for the new implants of 36 mm diameter and established implants of 28 mm diameter respectively. These wear rates compare with 6.3 mm3/10(6) cycles for zirconia-on-ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene tested on the same simulator and representative clinical values for metal-on-polyethylene of 36 mm3/year for heads of 22 mm diameter and a reported range of 60-180 mm3/year for 28 mm heads. These values do not translate directly into numbers of particles, since the metallic debris from metal-on-metal joints is very fine. The number of metallic particles may exceed the number of polyethylene wear particles from an otherwise similar metal-on-polyethylene joint by a factor of 10(3). A detailed discussion of the size and morphology of wear debris and tissue reaction to various forms of debris is beyond the scope of this paper, but the biological response to polymeric, metallic and ceramic wear debris forms a major subject for further study. The present investigation nevertheless confirms...

We examined stainless-steel, cobalt-chrome, titanium and alumina and zirconia ceramic femoral heads retrieved at revision surgery. All the heads had articulated against ultra-high-molecular-weight-polyethylene (UHMWPE) acetabular cups. We studied the simulation of third-body damage and the wear of UHMWPE against the various materials used for the heads. The surfaces of the retrieved heads were analysed using a two-dimensional contacting profilometer. Third-body damage was characterised by the mean height of the scratches above the mean line (Rpm). The alumina ceramic and zirconia ceramic retrieved heads were found to have significantly less damage. In laboratory studies the ceramics were also more resistant to simulated third-body damage than the metal alloys. We studied the wear of UHMWPE against the damaged counterfaces in simple configuration tests. The damaged ceramics produced less polyethylene wear than the damaged metal counterfaces. The wear factor of UHMWPE against the damaged materials was dependent on the amount of damage to the counterface (Rp). Our study has shown the benefit of using the harder and more damage-resistant ceramic materials for femoral heads.

We examined stainless-steel, cobalt-chrome, titanium and alumina and zirconia ceramic femoral heads retrieved at revision surgery. All the heads had articulated against ultra-high-molecularweight-polyethylene (UHMWPE) acetabular cups. We studied the simulation of third-body damage and the wear of UHMWPE against the various materials used for the heads. The surfaces of the retrieved heads were analysed using a two-dimensional contacting profilometer. Third-body damage was characterised by the mean height of the scratches above the mean line (R pm ).The alumina ceramic and zirconia ceramic retrieved heads were found to have significantly less damage. In laboratory studies the ceramics were also more resistant to simulated third-body damage than the metal alloys. We studied the wear of UHMWPE against the damaged counterfaces in simple configuration tests. The damaged ceramics produced less polyethylene wear than the damaged metal counterfaces. The wear factor of UHMWPE against the damaged materials was dependent on the amount of damage to the counterface (R p ). Our study has shown the benefit of using the harder and more damage-resistant ceramic materials for femoral heads.J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1998;80-B:894-9. Received 23 December 1997 ; Accepted after revision 3 July 1998Although there has been gradual improvement in the materials, design and surgical techniques for total hip replacement (THR) over the last decade, many problems still remain. In particular, for the long-term success of THR, factors which cause high rates of wear must be identified in order to reduce the amount of wear debris produced. The clinical importance of these problems has increased since THR has become available to younger and more active patients who are themselves demanding a better quality of life. Implants now require to have a low coefficient of friction, resistance to third-body damage and wear, the generation of small amounts of wear debris, and low cellular reactions to such wear debris.Many studies, including wear tests, scratch tests, measurements of explanted prostheses and analysis of wear debris, have been performed in order to understand the mechanism of wear of ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) in implants. Polyethylene debris produces a foreign-body-connective-tissue reaction in the form of osteolysis and the formation of granuloma along the implant-bone interface. This reaction often progresses to late aseptic loosening.1-3 The surface topography or roughness of the counterface which rubs against the UHMWPE is one of the most important factors controlling the rate of wear of the polymer. 4 In laboratory tests, a single scratch 2 m deep on a metal counterface has been shown to produce a dramatic increase in the wear of UHMWPE. 5The roughening of the femoral counterface can also increase the number of wear particles generated. Clinically, damage to metal femoral heads can be caused by third bodies: bone-cement particles, 6,7 bone particles 8 and metal debris. 9 In laboratory simulator studies little diffe...