No abstract

The use of AVP prior to EVAR is an efficient embolization technique that prevents the development of type II endoleaks.

Most carcinoid primary tumors are small and do not cause symptoms until complications (e.g. intestinal obstruction) or symptoms and signs of the carcinoid syndrome occur. Therefore in most cases an assessment of the primary tumor and its metastases must be performed. To determine the value of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) for localizing carcinoid tumors, we compared the results of SRS with those obtained with computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US) in 22 patients who had not undergone surgery for removal of the primary tumor. We could not find an advantage of SRS over CT and US for detecting the primary lesions. Tumors > 2 cm in diameter were regularly detected using all methods. SRS was not superior to CT or US for the detection of liver metastases. SRS showed the liver metastases in 16 of 18 patients, whereas CT and US detected liver metastases in all patients. For localization of extrahepatic abdominal and extraabdominal metastases (lymph nodes, bone), whole-body SRS showed an advantage over CT and US. We conclude that SRS is not superior to CT or US for localization of primary carcinoid tumors or liver metastases, although it did prove successful for visualizing extrahepatic and extraabdominal tumor spread. Additionally, SRS is useful for identifying receptor-positive metastases that may be treated by somatostatin analogs. Thus SRS should be performed in patients with a known carcinoid tumor, except those with an appendiceal carcinoid measuring < 1 cm in diameter.

BackgroundArterial ex situ back-table perfusion (BP) reportedly reduces ischemic-type biliary lesion after liver transplantation. We aimed to verify these findings in a prospective investigation.MethodsOur prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study involved livers retrieved from patients in 2 German regions, and compared the outcomes of standard aortic perfusion to those of aortic perfusion combined with arterial ex situ BP. The primary endpoint was the incidence of ischemic-type biliary lesions over a follow-up of 2 years after liver transplantation, whereas secondary endpoints included 2-year graft survival, initial graft damage as reflected by transaminase levels, and functional biliary parameters at 6 months after transplantation.ResultsA total of 75 livers preserved via standard aortic perfusion and 75 preserved via standard aortic perfusion plus arterial BP were treated using a standardized protocol. The incidence of clinically apparent biliary lesions after liver transplantation (n = 9 for both groups; P = 0.947), the 2-year graft survival rate (standard aortic perfusion, 74%; standard aortic perfusion plus arterial BP, 68%; P = 0.34), and incidence of initial graft injury did not differ between the 2 perfusion modes. Although 33 of the 77 patients with cholangiography workups exhibited injured bile ducts, only 10 had clinical symptoms.ConclusionsContrary to previous findings, the present study indicated that additional ex situ BP did not prevent ischemic-type biliary lesions or ischemia-reperfusion injury after liver transplantation. Moreover, there was considerable discrepancy between cholangiography findings regarding bile duct changes and clinically apparent cholangiopathy after transplantation, which should be considered when assessing ischemic-type biliary lesions.

Primary intimal sarcomas of the aorta are extremely rare and aggressive tumors metastasizing into bones and visceral organs including liver, kidneys, adrenal glands, and lung. The first symptoms are often nonspecific and often caused by arterial embolism. We report a case with an incidental finding of primary intimal sarcoma in an aneurysm of a patient with claudication due to tumor embolization.