The findings of this study indicate that rifampin induces the metabolism of delavirdine. Therefore therapy with rifampin is contraindicated in patients receiving delavirdine mesylate.

To determine the impact of gastric hypoacidity and acidic beverages on delavirdine mesylate pharmacokinetics in HIV-infected subjects, matched subjects with (n = 11) and without (n = 10) gastric hypoacidity received delavirdine 400 mg tid with either water or an acidic beverage (usually orange juice). The pharmacokinetics of delavirdine and its N-desalkyl metabolite were determined over 8 hours after 14 days of each treatment. Gastric pH was measured at baseline and during each pharmacokinetic evaluation. Delavirdine exposure (Cmax, AUC0-->8 h, and Cmin) was approximately 50% lower and the extent of delavirdine metabolism was higher in subjects with gastric hypoacidity. Orange juice produced a lower mean gastric pH compared to water and increased delavirdine absorption by 50% to 70% in subjects with gastric hypoacidity. However, orange juice had a marginal impact on delavirdine exposure in subjects without gastric hypoacidity. HIV-infected subjects with gastric hypoacidity significantly malabsorb delavirdine. Delavirdine administration with acidic beverages improves, but dose not normalize, absorption in these subjects.

Single doses of alprazolam (0, 0.5, 1.5 mg) or adinazolam mesylate sustained release tablets (SR) (0, 15, 45 mg) were administered to separate groups of 12 healthy men in a crossover design. Psychomotor performance was assessed by digit symbol substitution (DSST), and memory was assessed using a test battery which reflects various aspects of memory, including attention/working memory, explicit memory (recall of categorically related words), semantic memory (fragmented picture recognition, generation of category exemplars), and implicit memory (time saved in resolving fragmented pictures on the second exposure). Maximal psychomotor performance and memory decrements for the highest active doses were significantly different from placebo for all tasks at some time after dosing. The maximum decrement in DSST was not significantly different between drugs at the high dose (P = 0.288). Maximum attention/working memory decrements were significantly different between the high doses of the active compounds (P = 0.031), and the difference in maximum category recall decrement was marginally significant (P = 0.067). Access to knowledge memory was not significantly altered by these drugs; these results are similar to those obtained for other benzodiazepines. Both drugs exhibited slight effects on implicit memory. The results suggest that the sedative and memory effects of these triazolobenzodiazepines may not be closely related and suggest that adinazolam has a somewhat different spectrum of cognitive effects relative to alprazolam.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of adinazolam and N-demethyladinazolam (NDMAD), its major active metabolite, were compared in 39 healthy male volunteers (13 Asian, 12 Caucasian and 14 African-American). In a four-way, double-blind crossover design, subjects were administered (1) 30 mg oral adinazolam mesylate SR tablets, (2) 10 mg parenteral (i.v.) adinazolam mesylate, (3) 30 mg i.v. NDMAD and (4) placebo. Venous blood samples were collected at specific time intervals after drug administration and assayed for adinazolam and NDMAD concentrations. Sedation was rated at the time of each blood draw according to the Nurse-Rated Sedation Scale, and the digit-symbol substitution test was administered to evaluate psychomotor performance. After i.v. administration of adinazolam, Asians manifested significantly higher Cmax, larger AUC and lower CL of both adinazolam and NDMAD than their Caucasian and African-American counterparts. Likewise, after i.v. NDMAD Asians had significantly higher NDMAD Cmax and AUC than Caucasians and African-Americans. Most of these differences remained statistically significant after controlling for body surface area. With PO adinazolam, Asians also manifested substantially higher Cmax, larger AUC and lower CL for both adinazolam and NDMAD; however, with the exception of Cmax, these differences did not reach statistical significance. These results are in accordance with previous observations for ethnic-related differences in drug pharmacokinetics. In contrast, pharmacodynamic differences were not noted among the three study groups.

No abstract