SUMMARY Among 1800 referred hypertensive patients, 181 had recumbent diastolic blood pressures (DBP) below 90 mm Hg and standing DBP above 90 mm Hg. Orthostatic increments in DBP were greater in these orthostatic hypertensive patients than in 181 persistently hypertensive patients and 134 normotensive subjects. In 12 patients with orthostatic hypertension, the orthostatic fall in cardiac output (27.3 ± 2.9%, measured by a respiratory method) was double that in 8 normotensive subjects (13.3 ± 3.7%, p < 0.01). An inflated pressure suit over the pelvis and lower limbs prevented the excessive fall in cardiac output and significantly reduced (p < 0.02) the excessive rise in standing DBP in orthostatic hypertensive patients. Gravitational pooling of blood in the legs and reduction of blood in the head was measured by external gamma counting of autologous erythrocytes labeled with sodium pertechnetate Tc 99m through ports in fixed positions over the leg and the temple. Orthostatic intravascular pooling was significantly greater (p < 0.01) in orthostatic hypertensive subjects than in normotensive subjects, and the magnitudes of orthostatic pooling and orthostatic increases in DBP were closely correlated (r = +0.85). Plasma norepinephrine concentrations were similar in recumbency and after sustained handgrip exercise, but significantly greater (p < 0.01) after 5 to 60 mins of standing in orthostatic hypertensive subjects than in normotensive subjects. Our results indicate that orthostatic hypertension is common and that its mechanism in representative patients involves excessive orthostatic blood pooling, which results in decreased venous return, decreased cardiac output, increased sympathetic stimulation (presumably through low-pressure cardiopulmonary receptors), and excessive arteriolar, but not venular, constriction. (Hypertension
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.