This study examined the prevalence of cognitive impairment and its association with depressive symptoms and self-reported cognitive complaints in Danish outpatients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Fifty-seven consecutive female SLE-outpatients were examined with a comprehensive neuropsychological test-battery, a 20-item self-administered Perceived Deficits Questionnaire (PDQ) and a self-rated depression scale (Major Depression Inventory). Twenty-two patients (38.5%) were classified as cognitively impaired, mostly with deficits in executive functions and attention. Among cognitively impaired patients only 18.2% had significantly higher PDQ scores than the normal range. PDQ scores were highly correlated to depressive symptoms (r = 0.67, p < 0.001). Only two neuropsychological tests were significantly correlated with subjective cognitive complaints. When these variables and self-rated depression score were entered into a regression model both depression score and Symbol Digit Modalities Test performances were significantly associated with the PDQ score. In conclusion, cognitive impairments were common in this group of (mild) SLE outpatients, but the level of significant subjective cognitive complaints was low even among patients with cognitive impairment. Affective status may influence subjective experience of cognitive functions even more than cognitive functioning itself, and absence of subjective cognitive complaints did not exclude the presence of cognitive impairments.
lithium reduced the risk of relapse to 60 % and 39 %, respectively [5]. In the present study we aimed at investigating a potential dose-effect relationship regarding relapse prevention, by comparing daily dosages of escitalopram 10 mg, 20 mg and 30 mg, and additionally we compared these regimens with a daily dosage of 100 mg nortriptyline, which is generally considered an effective target dose in the treatment of acute depression. A dose range was chosen for escitalopram but not for nortriptyline, since escitalopram was the primary focus, whereas nortriptyline was our reference. Unfortunately, the planned sample size was not achieved, and therefore this report also addresses design issues having an impact on study feasibility, which might be of importance for future research in the field. Methods ▼ OrganisationThis study was carried out within the Danish University Antidepressant Group (DUAG), [6]. Introduction ▼Clinical practice and several randomised controlled studies have shown that a considerable proportion of patients with severe depression treated with electroconvulsive treatment (ECT) achieve remission after 8-12 treatment sessions over a period of 3-4 weeks [1]. However, the risk of relapse/recurrence is high in the following months. In a recent meta-analysis, the risk of relapse was estimated to be around 40 % in a 6 month period after ECT [2]. The evidence on relapse preventing efficacy of antidepressant medication after ECT is sparse regarding choice of drugs and dosage [3]. In a randomised controlled prevention study covering a 25-week period after ECT, patients treated with paroxetine had a significantly lower risk of relapse (10 % relapse) than patients treated with imipramine (30 % relapse) and placebo (65 % relapse) [4]. In a subsequent prevention study it was shown that 84 % of subjects in remission after ECT relapsed on placebo drug treatment over a 25-week period, while treatment with nortriptyline and the combination of nortriptyline and is an effective treatment for severe depression but carries a risk of relapse in the following months. Methods: Major depressive disorder patients in a current episode attaining remission from ECT (17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D 17 ) score ≤ 9) received randomly escitalopram 10 mg, 20 mg, 30 mg or nortriptyline 100 mg as monotherapies and were followed for 6 months in a multicentre double-blind set-up. Primary endpoint was relapse (HAM-D 17 ≥ 16). Results: As inclusion rate was low the study was prematurely stopped with only 47 patients
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.