The aim of the study was to assess the utility of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as a predictor of prostate volume indexes (total prostate volume (TPV), transition zone volume and transition zone index) in Korean men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). From September 2003 to April 2006, 3431 patients with LUTS were included in the study; they had a median age of 63.8 years, a median prostate volume of 22.6 ml and a median serum PSA of 1.04 ng/ml. Men with a baseline PSA of 410 ng/ml were excluded, to reduce the likelihood of including occult prostate cancer. Prostate volume indexes and serum PSA levels had an age-dependent log-linear relationship. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that PSA had good predictive value for various prostate volume indexes thresholds. The approximate age-specific criteria for detecting men with a TPV of 440 ml are PSA levels of 1.20, 1.44 and 1.72 ng/ml for men with LUTS in their sixth, seventh and eighth decades, respectively. The results show that serum PSA identifies Korean men with large prostates reasonably well. Korean men may produce and/or release more PSA per unit prostate volume than white men. The cutoffs for PSA and prostate volume to response to LUTS therapy should be determined in this population.
Study design: Retrospective study, based on cases of spinal cord injury (SCI). Objectives: To establish hazard ratios for risk of epididymo-orchitis in SCI. Setting: South Korea. Methods: A total of 140 male patients injured before 1987 were eligible for this investigation and have been followed up on a yearly basis from January 1987 to December 2003. Results: The average age at which the lesion occurred was 24.8 years old (range, 18-53). The average time since SCI was 16.9 years (range, 1-37). A total of 34 lesions (24.3%) were complete and 106 (75.7%) were incomplete. Over the 17 years, 39 patients (27.9%) were diagnosed with epididymo-orchitis. Epididymo-orchitis was more common for patients with a history of urethral stricture (66.7 versus 25.2%, P ¼ 0.014). We also found that epididymo-orchitis was more common for patients on clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) than with indwelling urethral catheterization (42.2% versus 8.3%, P ¼ 0.030). In multivariate analysis, patients on CIC had a 7.0-fold higher risk (odds ratio, 6.96; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-38.53; P ¼ 0.026); however, a history of urethral stricture lost statistical significance (P ¼ 0.074). For other variables, no positive association with epididymo-orchitis was observed. Conclusions: In this study, CIC was an independent risk factor for the development of epididymo-orchitis in patients with SCI. In addition, our findings suggest that urethral stricture may be a contributing factor for the development of epididymo-orchitis in these patients. Correct instructions about CIC are of utmost importance.
In addition to androgen, autonomic nerves may be involved in prostatic function. As patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) have impaired innervation of the prostate, the prostate volume and prostatespecific antigen (PSA) level in patients with SCI may be different from those of healthy men. Experiments in rats with SCI indicate that neurogenic factors play an important role in prostate growth and function but the same phenomena may not occur in men with SCI because the current animal models differ from clinical results in humans in several respects. Although many of studies indicate the importance of intact peripheral innervation on the secretory function of the prostate, the effect of more central denervation such as occurs in complete SCI at the cervical, thoracic, or lumbar levels on prostatic function is unclear. In addition, the impact of central nervous system injury on prostatic secretory activity, and consequently on serum PSA levels, is also not clear. Furthermore, the impact of hormonal changes on prostate cancer development and prognosis observed in patients with SCI may also be affected by the level of injury and patient age at the time of injury, which have not been studied. In this article, we review prostate activity and prostate cancer in SCI and discuss how they may relate to neurogenic factors.
Study design: Prospective, cross-sectional, case-control study. Setting: Outpatient department in Seoul, Korea. Objectives: To assess prostate volume and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels in Korean men with spinal cord injury (SCI). Methods: A total of 31 SCI patients with ages ranging between 45 and 81 years old (median age, 58 years) were studied. Thirty-one age-matched individuals without SCI were enrolled in the study as controls. We tested PSA levels and performed transrectal ultrasonographies on all enrolled patients. Of the patients with SCI, 20 were evaluated for testosterone, luteinizing hormone (LH), and folliclestimulating hormone (FSH) levels. Results: Serum PSA levels and prostate volume parameters in the two groups had similar values: the median (5th-95th percentiles) serum PSA level was 1.56 ng/ml (0.12-9.77) for SCI patients and 1.04 ng/ml (0.50-2.98) for controls (P ¼ 0.481), whereas the median (5th-95th percentiles) prostate volume was 18.33 ml (10.16-76.78) for SCI patients and 20.80 ml (14.23-41.22) for controls (P ¼ 0.072). No significant differences were found when serum PSA levels and prostate volumes were compared according to SCI patient injury characteristics. Testosterone levels were lower than the normal range in 7 SCI patients (35%), LH was higher than the normal range in 10 SCI patients (20%), and FSH was higher than the normal range in eight SCI patients (40%). We observed an age-related increase in FSH levels (r ¼ 0.634, P ¼ 0.004), although hormone levels did not correlate with serum PSA levels and prostate volume parameters. Conclusions: According to our results, serum PSA levels and prostate volume in Korean SCI patients are not different from those in uninjured men and are not affected by injury characteristics.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.