In this real-life study, 32% of patients received an inappropriate dose of DOAC. Several clinical factors can identify patients at risk of this situation.
Background There is a lack of evidence regarding the benefits of β-blocker treatment after invasively managed acute myocardial infarction (MI) without reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Methods and results TREatment with Beta-blockers after myOcardial infarction withOut reduced ejection fraction (REBOOT) trial is a pragmatic, controlled, prospective, randomized, open-label blinded endpoint (PROBE design) clinical trial testing the benefits of β-blocker maintenance therapy in patients discharged after MI with or without ST-segment elevation. Patients eligible for participation are those managed invasively during index hospitalization (coronary angiography), with LVEF >40%, and no history of heart failure (HF). At discharge, patients will be randomized 1:1 to β-blocker therapy (agent and dose according to treating physician) or no β-blocker therapy. The primary endpoint is a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal reinfarction, or HF hospitalization over a median follow-up period of 2.75 years (minimum 2 years, maximum 3 years). Key secondary endpoints include the incidence of the individual components of the primary composite endpoint, the incidence of cardiac death, and incidence of malignant ventricular arrhythmias or resuscitated cardiac arrest. The primary endpoint will be analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Conclusion The REBOOT trial will provide robust evidence to guide the prescription of β-blockers to patients discharged after MI without reduced LVEF.
Background Recent studies reported a decrease in the mortality of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. This favorable evolution could not extend to women. The interaction between gender and mortality in STEMI remains controversial. Purpose To assess the impact of female sex on mortality of patients with STEMI through of period of 11 years. Methods We conducted a retrospective longitudinal study using information provided by the minimal database system of the Spanish National Health System to identify all hospitalizations in patients aged 35–94 years with the principal diagnosis of STEMI from 2005–2015. Results A total of 325,017 STEMI were identified. Of them, 273,182 were included, and 106,277 (38.8%) were women. Women were older than men and had more comorbidities. Through the study period 53% men vs 37.2% underwent PTCA; women presented more frequently heart failure, shock and stroke than men (p<0.001, respectively). The mean crude in-hospital mortality rate for the whole study period was higher in women (OR: 2.18; 95% CI: 2.12.-2.23, p<0.0001). Female sex was independently associated with higher in-hospital mortality (adjusted OR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.14–1.22, p<0.001) (Table 1). The risk was maintained through the whole study period (lower OR: 1.14 in 2014; higher OR: 1.28 in 2006). Table 1. Variables independently associated with in-hospital mortality adjusted by risk in a multilevel logistic regression model, 2005–2015 STEMI In-hospital mortality Odds Ratio P 95% CI Woman 1.18 <0.001 1.14 1.22 Age 1.06 <0.001 1.06 1.06 History of PTCA 1.58 <0.001 1.40 1.77 Congestive heart failure 1.26 <0.001 1.22 1.30 Acute Myocardial Infarction 1.84 <0.001 1.54 2.20 Anterior myocardial infarction 1.47 <0.001 1.23 1.76 Cardio-respiratory failure or shock 15.25 <0.001 14.78 15.75 Hypertension 0.81 <0.001 0.79 0.84 Stroke 5.76 <0.001 5.18 6.42 Cerebrovascular disease 0.86 <0.001 0.79 0.93 Renal failure 1.95 <0.001 1.88 2.02 Vascular disease and complications 7.03 <0.001 5.72 8.63 CI, Confidence Interval. Conclusions Female sex is an independent predictor of mortality in patients with STEMI in Spain, maintaining through a period of the 11 years.
Background The 2021 European heart failure (HF) guidelines recommended treatment with an inhibitor of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone axis (RAAS), a beta-blocker (BB), a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA), and a cotransporter sodium-glucose type 2 inhibitor (SGLT2) in patients with HF and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40%. However, there is little evidence on implementing quadruple therapy in clinical practice. Purpose Study the implementation of quadruple therapy in patients with a new diagnosis of HF and reduced ejection fraction in clinical practice. Methods A prospective multicenter registry (38 centers in Spain) was carried out, including all patients newly diagnosed with HF with LVEF ≤40% in clinical practice. Their baseline and laboratory characteristics were recorded and their pharmacological treatment: at baseline (discharged from hospitalization or first outpatient visit within a maximum period of 1 month after the echocardiographic diagnosis), one month, and 3 months later. Results On 1th of March 2022, 349 patients were included, with baseline treatment data in 289. The mean age was 65.0±14.2 years, and 72.1% were men. The mean LVEF was 28.5±7.3%, with 57.6% in NYHA II and 29.1% in NYHA III–IV. The most frequent causes of cardiomyopathy were: ischemic (25.1%), tachycardiomyopathy (16.6%), and idiopathic (15.7%). 46.4% were dyslipidemic, 57.5% hypertensive and 33.3% diabetic. 65.1% of the patients were in sinus rhythm. Before HF diagnosis, 44.6% had been treated with RAASi, 22.8% with BB, 7.8% with MRA, 8.1% with iSGLT2, and 24.5% with diuretics. The drugs used at baseline and the changes during follow-up are shown in Table 1. Conclusions According to our cohort, almost 60% of newly diagnosed patients with HF and reduced LVEF start quadruple therapy during the first month after diagnosis, with sacubitril/valsartan being the preferred RAASi in most cases. The implementation of drugs with prognostic benefit is above 70% at baseline and exceeds 80% at one month of follow-up, with a progressive reduction in loop diuretics during follow-up. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): Spanish Society of Cardiology
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.