No abstract

The axillary lymph node status is the most powerful prognostic factor for breast cancer patients to date. The molecular mechanisms that control lymph node metastasis, however, remain poorly understood. To define patterns of genes or gene regulatory pathways that drive breast cancer lymph node metastasis, we compared the gene expression profiles of 15 primary breast carcinomas and their matching lymph node metastases using microarrays. In general, primary breast carcinomas and lymph node metastases do not differ at the transcriptional level by a common subset of genes. No classifier or single gene discriminating the group of primary tumours from those of the lymph node metastases could be identified. Also, in a series of 295 breast tumours, no classifier predicting lymph node metastasis could be developed. However, subtle differences in the expression of genes involved in extracellular-matrix organisation and growth factor signalling are detected in individual pairs of matching primary and metastatic tumours. Surprisingly, however, different sets of these genes are either up- or downregulated in lymph node metastases. Our data suggest that breast carcinomas do not use a shared gene set to accomplish lymph node metastasis.

The sentinel node status was a strong prognostic factor, even with a false-negative rate of 11 per cent. Published in abstract form as Eur J Nucl Med 1999; 26(Suppl): S57

Summary Five patients with a pleural malignancy (four malignant mesotheliomas and one localized low grade carcinoid) were treated with maximal surgical resection of the tumour followed by intraoperative adjuvant photodynamic therapy (PDT). The additional photodynamic treatment was performed with light of 652 nm from a high power diode laser, and meta-tetrahydroxy phenylchlorin as the photosensitizer. The light delivery to the thoracic cavity was monitored by in situ isotropic light detectors. The position of the light delivery fibre was adjusted to achieve optimal light distribution, taking account of reflected and scattered light in this hollow cavity. There was no 30-day post-operative mortality and only one patient suffered from a major complication (diaphragmatic rupture and haematopericardium). The operation time was increased by a maximum of 1 h to illuminate the total hemithoracic surface with 10 J cm-2 (incident and scattered light). The effect of the adjuvant PDT was monitored by examination of biopsies taken 24 h after surgery under thoracoscopic guidance. Significant damage, including necrosis, was observed in the marker lesions with remaining malignancy compared with normal tissue samples, which showed only an infiltration with PMN cells and oedema of the striated muscles cells. Of the five patients treated, four are alive with no signs of recurrent tumour with a follow-up of 9-11 months. One patient was diagnosed as having a tumour dissemination in the skin around the thoracoscopy scar and died of abdominal tumour spread. Light delivery to large surfaces for adjuvant PDT is feasible in a relatively short period of time (< 1 h). In situ dosimetry ensures optimal light distribution and allows total doses (incident plus scattered light) to be monitored at different positions within the cavity. This combination of light delivery and dosimetry is well suited for adjuvant treatment with PDT in malignant pleural tumours.

Three new cases of the spindle cell tumour of the breast, usually termed myofibroblastoma, are reported. The histology and the immunological profile (expression of vimentin, CD34 antigen and of muscular markers) appear similar to those of solitary fibrous tumours recently described in various sites. It is proposed to include these mammary lesions into the group of solitary fibrous tumours and to regard breast as an additional site of origin.