Cannabinoids have been shown to modulate central autonomic regulation and baroreflex control of blood pressure (BP). The presence of cannabinoid CB(1) receptors on fibers in the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS) suggests that some presynaptic modulation of transmitter release could occur in this region, which receives direct afferent projections from arterial baroreceptors and cardiac mechanoreceptors. This study, therefore, was performed to determine the mechanism(s) of effects of microinjection of an endocannabinoid, arachidonylethanolamide (anandamide, AEA), into the NTS on baroreflex sympathetic nerve responses produced by phenylephrine-induced pressure changes in anesthetized rats. AEA prolonged reflex inhibition of renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA), suggesting an increase in baroreflex sensitivity. This effect of AEA was blocked by prior microinjection of SR-141716 to block cannabinoid CB(1) receptors. To determine whether this baroreflex enhancement by AEA involved a GABA(A) mechanism, the baroreflex response to AEA was tested after prior blockade of postsynaptic GABA(A) receptors by bicuculline, which would eliminate any effects due to modulation of GABA activity. After bicuculline, which alone prolonged the baroreflex inhibition of RSNA, AEA shortened the duration of RSNA inhibition, suggesting a possible presynaptic inhibition of glutamate release previously obscured by a more dominant GABA(A) effect. To support a possible physiological role for AEA, AEA concentration in the NTS was measured after a phenylephrine-induced increase in BP. AEA content in the NTS was increased significantly over that in normotensive animals. These results support the hypothesis that AEA content is increased by brief periods of hypertension and suggest that AEA can modulate the baroreflex through activation of CB(1) receptors within the NTS, possibly modulating effectiveness of GABA and/or glutamate neurotransmission.

This study examined firing patterns of single-fiber carotid baroreceptors in response to slow ramp increases in carotid sinus pressure (1-2 mm Hg/sec) in vascularly isolated carotid sinus preparations in thiopental-anesthetized dogs (25 mg/kg, plus 10 mg/kg/hr

This study was performed to determine if selective elimination of afferent input from two different types of previously described baroreceptors altered the ability of the dog to regulate blood pressure (BP), examining specifically if there was differential loss of baroreceptor control of tonic levels of baseline pressure versus dynamic changes in pressure. In the first series of experiments in this study, anodal block of the carotid sinus nerve was used to selectively block afferent input in a sequence from large-diameter A-fiber carotid baroreceptors (mostly type I) to smaller A-fiber and nonmyelinated C-fiber baroreceptors (mostly type II). In the second series of experiments, anesthetic block of the carotid sinus nerve with bupivacaine was used to selectively eliminate afferent input in reverse order from anodal block, first blocking input from baroreceptors with small afferent fibers and then additionally eliminating input from the larger-diameter A-fiber baroreceptors. The effects of selective elimination of each baroreceptor type were determined by monitoring baseline BP during constant carotid sinus pressure (CSP) perfusion of a vascularly isolated carotid sinus (tonic control) and obtaining baroreflex sensitivity (slope) during ramp pressure stimulations of the carotid sinus (dynamic control) under various blocking conditions. Low levels of anodal block significantly attenuated baroreflex sensitivity (-0.84±0.11 versus -0.63+±0.10 mm Hg BP/mm Hg CSP) at levels of block that had no effect on tonic baseline BP (158.41±9.5 versus 160.7+9.5 mm Hg BP). In contrast, low levels of bupivacaine block produced significant increases in tonic BP (158.8±6.4 versus 169.0±6.5 mm Hg BP), whereas there was no effect on dynamic baroreflex sensitivity (-0 If the two types of baroreceptors do contribute differently to BP regulation, then selective stimulation or elimination of afferent input of one type of receptor should alter the ability of the animal to regulate pressure. The possibility of differential control of pressure by different types of baroreceptors has been studied by other investigators who examined baroreflex effects of activation of A-fiber versus C-fiber baroreceptors, a classification that closely, but not exactly, follows classification of type I versus type II baroreceptors. Type I baroreceptors have been found to primarily have large myelinated A-fiber afferents, whereas type II baroreceptors primarily have smaller A-fiber and unmyelinated C-fiber afferents. These studies indicated that both A-fiber and C-fiber baroreceptors produced depressor by guest on May 9, 2018

No abstract