Partial flow dilution (PFD) offers a number of benefits relative to conventional full flow dilution tunnels for motor vehicle PM emissions measurement in terms of measurement variability, footprint, and cost. Its implementation into automotive emissions test cells depends on its ability to record PM mass emissions equivalent to the current constant volume sampling (CVS) dilution tunnel approach. The present work examines factors critical to successful application of PFD sampling and compares vehicle PM emissions measured simultaneously by PFD and CVS tunnel. The combination of a current technology commercial PFD system and ultrasonic flow meter fulfill the two principal requirements of accurate exhaust flow measurement and fast time response for proportional sampling. PM mass emissions measured by PFD versus CVS systems satisfy a 1.03 § 0.03 regression for the regulatory FTP test cycle, and comparably good agreement for the supplemental US06 drive cycle. Both dilution approaches are amenable to the single filter approach newly allowed under EPA regulations; however, the PFD sample weighted approach has the capability to provide a roughly 35% lower variability relative to the flow weighted approach used in the CVS method. Whereas partial flow dilution has seen application in heavy duty engine measurements, the present work demonstrates its feasibility for light duty chassis dynamometer testing.