The suboptimal efficacy of the currently available 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine in the growing population of adults ú65 years old may be related to the limited immunogenicity of the vaccine polysaccharides in this group. In this study, the majority of elderly outpatients with stable chronic illnesses generated a vigorous IgG response to seven vaccine serotypes comparable to that of healthy young adults at 1, 3, and 16 months after immunization. Moreover, the quality and function of anticapsular antibodies, measured as avidity and in vitro opsonization, were comparable between elderly and young subjects over time. However, a subset (Ç20%) of elderly outpatients responded to fewer than two of seven serotypes tested 1 and 3 months after immunization, whereas none of the healthy young adults were such poor responders. Thus, despite the adequate mean immune responses of the elderly as a group, a substantial proportion of elderly persons may have poor responses to the currently available pneumococcal vaccine.Effective prevention of Streptococcus pneumoniae infection control studies. These studies have indicated variable and incomplete protection (60% -81%) from lethal disease among has renewed priority in an era in which the emergence of antibiotic-resistant strains has further compromised efforts to immunized elderly adults [6 -11].The variable efficacy of the pneumococcal vaccine in the reduce early mortality from invasive pneumococcal infection [1 -3]. Although the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide elderly presumably reflects the poor immunogenicity of polysaccharide-based vaccines in this population. Measurements of (PPS) vaccine was formulated to prevent invasive infection in the elderly and other high-risk populations, the protective effi-PPS-specific serum antibodies after pneumococcal immunization of the elderly have produced conflicting results, possibly cacy of this vaccine for the growing population of adults ú65 years old remains uncertain. Doubts regarding the vaccine's because of differences in the selection of subjects (e.g., chronically ill or unusually healthy elderly) or controls (e.g., historical ability to prevent pneumococcal infection in this group were first raised by prospective randomized trials that did not detect controls or cohort) and in methods for assaying antibody concentrations [12 -20]. More importantly, measures of the quality significant reductions in the incidence of pneumococcal bronchitis, pneumonia, or bacteremia in immunized elderly adults of immune responses to pneumococcal vaccine in the elderly have been assayed in only a single report [19], and the func- [4,5]. However, these studies may have lacked sufficient statistical power to exclude the possibility of vaccine efficacy, due tional response to pneumococcal immunization has not been previously assessed. to the unexpectedly low frequency of pneumococcal infection during these trials. Because further clinical trials were not feasiTherefore, in order to establish the effectiveness of pneumococcal vaccination in elderl...
The 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine was formulated to prevent invasive infection in the elderly and other high-risk populations from the most prevalent Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes. However, the immunogenicity of all 23 vaccine polysaccharides has not been fully characterized in elderly adults. We previously reported that whereas the majority of elderly subjects had vigorous immune responses to selected pneumococcal vaccine polysaccharides, a subset of elderly individuals responded to fewer than two of seven vaccine serotypes after immunization. To determine whether these elderly low responders have a general inability to respond to pneumococcal vaccine and to determine whether elderly low responders might be identified by their responses to a few polysaccharides, we measured antibody responses of elderly adults to all 23 vaccine polysaccharides after pneumococcal immunization. As a group, elderly subjects showed a significant rise after immunization in geometric mean antibody levels to all 23 vaccine serotypes. However, when individual rather than group immune responses were assessed, the 23-valent vaccine did not appear to be uniformly immunogenic in these elderly subjects. Eleven elderly subjects (20%) had twofold increases in specific antibody after vaccination to only 5 or fewer of the 23 vaccine polysaccharides, and they did not respond to the most prevalent serotypes causing invasive disease. Antibody responses to serotype 9N were found to reliably distinguish low vaccine responders from other elderly subjects. However, no particular group of vaccine polysaccharides could be used as a marker for adequate immune responses if only postvaccination sera were analyzed.
Myelin basic protein was extracted from frontal lobe white matter obtained at autopsy from seven individuals ranging in age from 72 to 78 years. Qualitative and quantitative comparisons were made between basic protein from this group and that extracted from another group of individuals ranging in age from 45 to 65 years. The basic protein content of the older brains was considerably lower than that of the younger brains. Qualitative studies that included assay for encephalitogenic activity, disk gel electrophoresis at pH 4.3, and immunoprecipitation did not reveal any difference in the basic protein derived from the two age groups. Possible factors that may help explain the decreased basic protein content of the aged brain are discussed.
Supported by research funds from the Veterans Administration.Address all correspondence to: Martin M. Oken, M.D., Hematology Section, V.A. Hospital, 54th St. and 48th Ave. So., Minneapolis, Minn. 55417.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.